Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
HackerEarth vs myInterview
HackerEarth
HackerEarth is a technical-hiring platform that auto-scores coding assessments under AI proctoring, runs FaceCode live coding interviews with AI-generated summaries, and offers OnScreen, an AI video-avatar interviewer that scores candidates against a fixed rubric.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
myInterview
myInterview is an asynchronous one-way video interview platform that records candidate video responses and applies AI-assisted "Smart Shortlisting" and Big Five-based personality insights to help recruiters screen and rank applicants.
Substantial gaps
Video interview
The result
HackerEarth leads myInterview on 6 of the 7 criteria.
HackerEarth scores 46 and myInterview 37 under rubric v1.0, a 9-point gap across the Assessment and Video interview cohorts. HackerEarth leads 6 of the 7 criteria and the remaining criterion is level, so myInterview is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 6 HackerEarth leads is FRIA Support, HackerEarth 32 to myInterview 25. The advantage HackerEarth holds is spread out: Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (HackerEarth 55, myInterview 38, 20% weight), yet it supplies only 36% of the weighted points HackerEarth gains across the 6 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- HackerEarth6
- myInterview0
- Level1
- Widest raw gap
- Article 11 Technical Documentation55 vs 38
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Article 11 Technical Documentation20% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
HackerEarth is filed under Assessment AI, myInterview under Video interview AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | HackerEarth | myInterview |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | AU |
| Founded | 2012 | 2014 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight36% of the movement so far
HackerEarth55myInterview383.4 weighted points to HackerEarth
- 2
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight52% of the movement so far
HackerEarth52myInterview421.5 weighted points to HackerEarth
- 3
Customer Documentation
8% weight67% of the movement so far
HackerEarth57myInterview401.4 weighted points to HackerEarth
- 4
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight79% of the movement so far
HackerEarth42myInterview331.1 weighted points to HackerEarth
- 5
FRIA Support
15% weight90% of the movement so far
HackerEarth32myInterview251.1 weighted points to HackerEarth
- 6
Human Oversight Design
12% weight100% of the movement so far
HackerEarth56myInterview481.0 weighted points to HackerEarth
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +9.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +9 beside that +9.3.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HackerEarth minus myInterview, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | HackerEarth | myInterview | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 55 | 38 | +17 | +3.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 35 | - | - |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 32 | 25 | +7 | +1.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 42 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 56 | 48 | +8 | +1.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 33 | +9 | +1.1 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 57 | 40 | +17 | +1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 46F | 37F | +9 | +9.3 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HackerEarth | myInterview | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 8 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 34 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 6 | Sources on a separate domain |
HackerEarth has 39 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; myInterview has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 7 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for myInterview sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 52 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 39 for HackerEarth, across 1 distinct source domain, and 13 for myInterview, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HackerEarth last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- myInterview last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.