Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
HackerEarth vs Talview
HackerEarth
HackerEarth is a technical-hiring platform that auto-scores coding assessments under AI proctoring, runs FaceCode live coding interviews with AI-generated summaries, and offers OnScreen, an AI video-avatar interviewer that scores candidates against a fixed rubric.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
Talview
AI-powered hiring and exam-integrity platform spanning video interviewing, skills assessments, identity verification, and AI proctoring.
Substantial gaps
Video interview
The result
4 points separate HackerEarth and Talview.
HackerEarth holds a 4-point edge over Talview under rubric v1.0, 46 to 42, across the Assessment and Video interview cohorts. The 7 criteria split 6 to 1 in favour of HackerEarth: HackerEarth is ahead on Post-Market Monitoring and Talview on Bias Audit Transparency. The advantage HackerEarth holds is spread out: Post-Market Monitoring is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (HackerEarth 42, Talview 32, 12% weight), yet it supplies only 27% of the weighted points HackerEarth gains across the 6 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- HackerEarth6
- Talview1
- Widest raw gap
- Post-Market Monitoring42 vs 32
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Post-Market Monitoring12% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
HackerEarth is filed under Assessment AI, Talview under Video interview AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | HackerEarth | Talview |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2012 | 2012 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight24% of the movement so far
HackerEarth42Talview321.2 weighted points to HackerEarth
- 2
FRIA Support
15% weight46% of the movement so far
HackerEarth32Talview251.1 weighted points to HackerEarth
- 3
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight66% of the movement so far
HackerEarth55Talview501.0 weighted points to HackerEarth
- 4
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight78% of the movement so far
HackerEarth52Talview480.6 weighted points to HackerEarth
- 5
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight89% of the movement so far
HackerEarth35Talview380.5 weighted points to Talview
- 6
Customer Documentation
8% weight98% of the movement so far
HackerEarth57Talview520.4 weighted points to HackerEarth
- 7
Human Oversight Design
12% weight100% of the movement so far
HackerEarth56Talview550.1 weighted points to HackerEarth
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +3.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +4 beside that +3.8.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HackerEarth minus Talview, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | HackerEarth | Talview | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 55 | 50 | +5 | +1.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 38 | -3 | -0.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 32 | 25 | +7 | +1.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 48 | +4 | +0.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 56 | 55 | +1 | +0.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 32 | +10 | +1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 57 | 52 | +5 | +0.4 |
| Total | 100% | 46F | 42F | +4 | +3.8 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HackerEarth | Talview | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 8 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 34 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 11 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HackerEarth has 39 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Talview has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 56 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 39 for HackerEarth, across 1 distinct source domain, and 17 for Talview, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HackerEarth last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Talview last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.