Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
HackerEarth vs Vervoe
HackerEarth
HackerEarth is a technical-hiring platform that auto-scores coding assessments under AI proctoring, runs FaceCode live coding interviews with AI-generated summaries, and offers OnScreen, an AI video-avatar interviewer that scores candidates against a fixed rubric.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
Vervoe
AI-powered skills-assessment platform that grades and ranks candidates on performance in role-specific, task-based assessments.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
The result
HackerEarth and Vervoe tie at 46.
HackerEarth and Vervoe tie at 46 under rubric v1.0 inside the Assessment cohort, arriving there from different criteria. HackerEarth leads 3 of the 7 criteria and Vervoe 4, yet the two totals land on the same number. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (HackerEarth 35, Vervoe 52) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 75% of the weighted advantage Vervoe holds across the 4 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- HackerEarth3
- Vervoe4
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency35 vs 52
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
HackerEarth and Vervoe are both filed under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | HackerEarth | Vervoe |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | AU |
| Founded | 2012 | 2016 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight35% of the movement so far
HackerEarth35Vervoe523.1 weighted points to Vervoe
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight57% of the movement so far
HackerEarth55Vervoe452.0 weighted points to HackerEarth
- 3
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight77% of the movement so far
HackerEarth42Vervoe281.7 weighted points to HackerEarth
- 4
FRIA Support
15% weight89% of the movement so far
HackerEarth32Vervoe251.1 weighted points to HackerEarth
- 5
Human Oversight Design
12% weight94% of the movement so far
HackerEarth56Vervoe600.5 weighted points to Vervoe
- 6
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight99% of the movement so far
HackerEarth52Vervoe550.4 weighted points to Vervoe
- 7
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
HackerEarth57Vervoe580.1 weighted points to Vervoe
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +0.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that +0.7.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HackerEarth minus Vervoe, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | HackerEarth | Vervoe | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 55 | 45 | +10 | +2.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 52 | -17 | -3.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 32 | 25 | +7 | +1.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 55 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 56 | 60 | -4 | -0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 28 | +14 | +1.7 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 57 | 58 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Total | 100% | 46F | 46F | - | +0.7 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HackerEarth | Vervoe | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 8 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 34 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 15 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
HackerEarth has 39 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Vervoe has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 59 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 39 for HackerEarth, across 1 distinct source domain, and 20 for Vervoe, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HackerEarth last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Vervoe last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.