§ The result
HackerRank leads HireLogic on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, HackerRank (Assessment) opens a 21-point lead on HireLogic (Video interview), 55 to 34. HackerRank leads every one of the 7 criteria, HireLogic none of them, and the closest of the 7 is FRIA Support, HackerRank 35 to HireLogic 25. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — HackerRank 68, HireLogic 15 — and at an 18% weight it carries 45% of the weighted advantage HackerRank holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
HackerRank
HackerRank is a technical skills assessment platform for developer hiring that uses coding tests, interviews, and AI-based features (question generation, ML plagiarism/AI-code detection, and image-analysis proctoring) to evaluate candidates.
Vendor profile
HireLogic
HireLogic joins phone, video and in-person interviews to transcribe them and generate AI notes, job-description coverage, candidate insights and flags for potentially discriminatory interviewer questions, and also offers an asynchronous AI interview agent that scores candidates on relevance and depth of knowledge.
§ The record
HackerRank is filed under Assessment AI, HireLogic under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HackerRank | HireLogic |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Low |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2009 | Not recorded |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 45% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HackerRank 68 · HireLogic 15
9.5 weighted points to HackerRank
20% weight · 63% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HackerRank 60 · HireLogic 42
3.6 weighted points to HackerRank
12% weight · 72% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HackerRank 45 · HireLogic 28
2.0 weighted points to HackerRank
15% weight · 80% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HackerRank 35 · HireLogic 25
1.5 weighted points to HackerRank
15% weight · 87% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HackerRank 55 · HireLogic 45
1.5 weighted points to HackerRank
12% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HackerRank 60 · HireLogic 48
1.4 weighted points to HackerRank
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HackerRank 62 · HireLogic 45
1.4 weighted points to HackerRank
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +21.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 21.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +21 beside that +21.0.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HackerRank minus HireLogic.
| Category | Weight | HackerRank | HireLogic | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 60 | 42 | +18 | +3.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 68 | 15 | +53 | +9.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 25 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 45 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 48 | +12 | +1.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 45 | 28 | +17 | +2.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 45 | +17 | +1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 55 (F) | 34 (F) | +21 | +21.0 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HackerRank | HireLogic | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 14 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 23 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HackerRank has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 14 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; HireLogic has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HackerRank sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 47 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for HackerRank, across 3 distinct source domains, and 29 for HireLogic, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HackerRank last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HireLogic last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next