§ The result
PageUp leads Harver on 6 of the 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, PageUp, filed under ATS-integrated, finishes on 64 (D) and Harver, filed under Assessment, on 56 (F), 8 points apart. Harver is ahead on none of the 7 criteria: PageUp takes 6, the remaining criterion is level, and the nearest of those 6 is Customer Documentation, Harver 60 to PageUp 63. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Post-Market Monitoring (Harver 40, PageUp 55) and Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Harver 65, PageUp 74), the second being 24% of the weighted advantage PageUp holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Harver
Pre-employment assessment suite covering cognitive ability, behavioral, and situational judgement, including the legacy Pymetrics games product.
Vendor profile
PageUp
PageUp is an enterprise talent acquisition suite (ATS, recruitment marketing/CRM, onboarding, learning and performance). Its AI Skills Matching sorts each applicant's resume against skills taken from the job ad into five bands, from Excellent Match to Not a Match, and recruiters reach those results through Paige, its conversational assistant.
§ The record
Harver is filed under Assessment AI, PageUp under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Harver is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Harver | PageUp |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | NL | AU |
| Founded | 2015 | 1997 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 24% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Harver 65 · PageUp 74
1.8 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 48% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Harver 40 · PageUp 55
1.8 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 71% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Harver 50 · PageUp 64
1.7 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 87% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Harver 55 · PageUp 63
1.2 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 97% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Harver 35 · PageUp 40
0.8 weighted points to PageUp
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Harver 60 · PageUp 63
0.2 weighted points to PageUp
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -7.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -8 beside that -7.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Harver minus PageUp.
| Category | Weight | Harver | PageUp | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 65 | 74 | -9 | -1.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 80 | 80 | - | - |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 40 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 63 | -8 | -1.2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 50 | 64 | -14 | -1.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 55 | -15 | -1.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 63 | -3 | -0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 56 (F) | 64 (D) | -8 | -7.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Harver | PageUp | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 0 | — | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 10 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 24 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Harver has 10 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 0 documented absences; PageUp has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for PageUp sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 38 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 10 for Harver, across 1 distinct source domain, and 28 for PageUp, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Harver last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- PageUp last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next