§ The result
Harver leads SeekOut on all 7 criteria.
Harver finishes 22 points clear of SeekOut under rubric v1.0 — 56 against 34 — across the Assessment and Sourcing cohorts. Harver leads every one of the 7 criteria and 4 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; SeekOut leads none. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Harver 80, SeekOut 40, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 33% of the weighted advantage Harver holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Harver
Pre-employment assessment suite covering cognitive ability, behavioral, and situational judgement, including the legacy Pymetrics games product.
Vendor profile
SeekOut
Sourcing platform aggregating public profile data into a searchable talent index, with AI-assisted candidate matching and outreach.
§ The record
Harver is filed under Assessment AI, SeekOut under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Harver is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Harver | SeekOut |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | NL | US |
| Founded | 2015 | 2017 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 33% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Harver 80 · SeekOut 40
7.2 weighted points to Harver
20% weight · 60% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Harver 65 · SeekOut 35
6.0 weighted points to Harver
15% weight · 73% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Harver 55 · SeekOut 35
3.0 weighted points to Harver
8% weight · 82% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Harver 60 · SeekOut 35
2.0 weighted points to Harver
12% weight · 90% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Harver 40 · SeekOut 25
1.8 weighted points to Harver
15% weight · 97% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Harver 35 · SeekOut 25
1.5 weighted points to Harver
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Harver 50 · SeekOut 45
0.6 weighted points to Harver
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +22.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 22.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +22 beside that +22.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Harver minus SeekOut.
| Category | Weight | Harver | SeekOut | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 65 | 35 | +30 | +6.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 80 | 40 | +40 | +7.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 25 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 35 | +20 | +3.0 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 50 | 45 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 25 | +15 | +1.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 35 | +25 | +2.0 |
| Total | 100% | 56 (F) | 34 (F) | +22 | +22.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Harver | SeekOut | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 10 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Harver has 10 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 0 documented absences; SeekOut has 9 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 5 with a source URL, 4 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 19 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 10 for Harver, across 1 distinct source domain, and 9 for SeekOut, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Harver last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- SeekOut last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next