§ The result
HeyMilo leads HeroHunt.ai on all 7 criteria.
Rubric v1.0 puts 31 points between HeyMilo (Screening) and HeroHunt.ai (Sourcing): 61 (D) for HeyMilo, 30 (F) for HeroHunt.ai. Of the 7 criteria HeroHunt.ai wins none, and the narrowest lead HeyMilo holds is on Human Oversight Design, HeroHunt.ai 55 to HeyMilo 64. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (HeroHunt.ai 10, HeyMilo 83) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 43% of the weighted advantage HeyMilo holds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
HeroHunt.ai
HeroHunt.ai's AI Recruiter (launched as Uwi) searches a claimed 1 billion+ professional profiles, scores and ranks them against a job description with language models, and sends AI-personalised outreach to the candidates a user approves.
Vendor profile
HeyMilo
HeyMilo is an AI recruiter for high-volume hiring whose voice and video AI agent conducts and scores async and live conversational screening interviews against recruiter-defined rubrics and syncs results to the customer's ATS.
§ The record
HeroHunt.ai is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, HeyMilo under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only HeyMilo is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HeroHunt.ai | HeyMilo |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | NL | US |
| Founded | 2021 | 2023 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 43% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HeroHunt.ai 10 · HeyMilo 83
13.1 weighted points to HeyMilo
20% weight · 69% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HeroHunt.ai 20 · HeyMilo 58
7.6 weighted points to HeyMilo
15% weight · 77% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HeroHunt.ai 45 · HeyMilo 62
2.5 weighted points to HeyMilo
15% weight · 85% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HeroHunt.ai 27 · HeyMilo 42
2.3 weighted points to HeyMilo
12% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HeroHunt.ai 28 · HeyMilo 46
2.2 weighted points to HeyMilo
8% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HeroHunt.ai 48 · HeyMilo 66
1.4 weighted points to HeyMilo
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HeroHunt.ai 55 · HeyMilo 64
1.1 weighted points to HeyMilo
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -30.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 30.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -31 beside that -30.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HeroHunt.ai minus HeyMilo.
| Category | Weight | HeroHunt.ai | HeyMilo | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 20 | 58 | -38 | -7.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 10 | 83 | -73 | -13.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 27 | 42 | -15 | -2.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 62 | -17 | -2.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 64 | -9 | -1.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 46 | -18 | -2.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 48 | 66 | -18 | -1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 30 (F) | 61 (D) | -31 | -30.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HeroHunt.ai | HeyMilo | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | — | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 25 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 18 | 3 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
HeroHunt.ai has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; HeyMilo has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HeroHunt.ai and HeyMilo sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 53 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 32 for HeroHunt.ai, across 2 distinct source domains, and 21 for HeyMilo, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HeroHunt.ai last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HeyMilo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next