§ The result
HiredScore leads HeroHunt.ai on all 7 criteria.
The Sourcing cohort pairing of HiredScore and HeroHunt.ai comes out 52 to 30 under rubric v1.0, a 22-point lead for HiredScore. HiredScore takes all 7 criteria and HeroHunt.ai none of them; the nearest contest is FRIA Support, HeroHunt.ai 27 to HiredScore 30. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — HeroHunt.ai 20, HiredScore 65 — and at a 20% weight it carries 42% of the weighted advantage HiredScore holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
HeroHunt.ai
HeroHunt.ai's AI Recruiter (launched as Uwi) searches a claimed 1 billion+ professional profiles, scores and ranks them against a job description with language models, and sends AI-personalised outreach to the candidates a user approves.
Vendor profile
HiredScore
AI-driven talent orchestration layer that ranks and routes candidates within an existing ATS. Acquired by Workday in 2024.
§ The record
HeroHunt.ai and HiredScore are both filed under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only HeroHunt.ai is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | HeroHunt.ai | HiredScore |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | NL | US |
| Founded | 2021 | 2012 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 42% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HeroHunt.ai 20 · HiredScore 65
9.0 weighted points to HiredScore
18% weight · 80% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HeroHunt.ai 10 · HiredScore 55
8.1 weighted points to HiredScore
15% weight · 87% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HeroHunt.ai 45 · HiredScore 55
1.5 weighted points to HiredScore
8% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HeroHunt.ai 48 · HiredScore 60
1.0 weighted points to HiredScore
12% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HeroHunt.ai 28 · HiredScore 35
0.8 weighted points to HiredScore
12% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HeroHunt.ai 55 · HiredScore 60
0.6 weighted points to HiredScore
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HeroHunt.ai 27 · HiredScore 30
0.4 weighted points to HiredScore
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -21.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 21.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -22 beside that -21.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HeroHunt.ai minus HiredScore.
| Category | Weight | HeroHunt.ai | HiredScore | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 20 | 65 | -45 | -9.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 10 | 55 | -45 | -8.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 27 | 30 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 55 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 60 | -5 | -0.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 35 | -7 | -0.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 48 | 60 | -12 | -1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 30 (F) | 52 (F) | -22 | -21.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HeroHunt.ai | HiredScore | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 25 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 7 | 2 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
HeroHunt.ai has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; HiredScore has 9 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 7 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HeroHunt.ai and HiredScore sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 41 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 32 for HeroHunt.ai, across 2 distinct source domains, and 9 for HiredScore, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HeroHunt.ai last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HiredScore last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next