§ The result
iMocha leads HeroHunt.ai on all 7 criteria.
Rubric v1.0 puts 26 points between iMocha (Assessment) and HeroHunt.ai (Sourcing): 56 for iMocha, 30 for HeroHunt.ai. iMocha leads every one of the 7 criteria and 4 of them by 20 raw points or more, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them; HeroHunt.ai leads none. Even Article 11 Technical Documentation, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (HeroHunt.ai 20, iMocha 68, 20% weight), is only 38% of the weighted advantage iMocha builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
HeroHunt.ai
HeroHunt.ai's AI Recruiter (launched as Uwi) searches a claimed 1 billion+ professional profiles, scores and ranks them against a job description with language models, and sends AI-personalised outreach to the candidates a user approves.
Vendor profile
iMocha
iMocha is an AI-powered skills assessment and skills-intelligence platform that evaluates candidates and employees across technical, cognitive, coding, and soft skills for hiring and internal talent management, including AI-based coding simulators and an AI video interviewer (Tara).
§ The record
HeroHunt.ai is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, iMocha under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only iMocha is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HeroHunt.ai | iMocha |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | NL | IN |
| Founded | 2021 | 2015 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 38% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HeroHunt.ai 20 · iMocha 68
9.6 weighted points to iMocha
18% weight · 62% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HeroHunt.ai 10 · iMocha 44
6.1 weighted points to iMocha
15% weight · 74% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HeroHunt.ai 45 · iMocha 66
3.1 weighted points to iMocha
12% weight · 84% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HeroHunt.ai 28 · iMocha 48
2.4 weighted points to iMocha
15% weight · 90% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HeroHunt.ai 27 · iMocha 38
1.6 weighted points to iMocha
8% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HeroHunt.ai 48 · iMocha 66
1.4 weighted points to iMocha
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HeroHunt.ai 55 · iMocha 64
1.1 weighted points to iMocha
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -25.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 25.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -26 beside that -25.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HeroHunt.ai minus iMocha.
| Category | Weight | HeroHunt.ai | iMocha | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 20 | 68 | -48 | -9.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 10 | 44 | -34 | -6.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 27 | 38 | -11 | -1.6 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 66 | -21 | -3.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 64 | -9 | -1.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 48 | -20 | -2.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 48 | 66 | -18 | -1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 30 (F) | 56 (F) | -26 | -25.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HeroHunt.ai | iMocha | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 25 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 21 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
HeroHunt.ai has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; iMocha has 26 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HeroHunt.ai and iMocha sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 58 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 32 for HeroHunt.ai, across 2 distinct source domains, and 26 for iMocha, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HeroHunt.ai last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- iMocha last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next