§ The result
micro1 takes the total, HeroHunt.ai takes more of the criteria.
micro1 scores 36 and HeroHunt.ai 30 under rubric v1.0, a 6-point gap across the Screening and Sourcing cohorts. HeroHunt.ai leads more of the criteria than micro1 — 4 to 2 — but Article 11 Technical Documentation, which micro1 leads, carries 20% of the rubric, and the weighted sum still falls to micro1. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (HeroHunt.ai 20, micro1 50) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 77% of the weighted advantage micro1 holds across the 2 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
HeroHunt.ai
HeroHunt.ai's AI Recruiter (launched as Uwi) searches a claimed 1 billion+ professional profiles, scores and ranks them against a job description with language models, and sends AI-personalised outreach to the candidates a user approves.
Vendor profile
micro1
Zara, micro1's LLM-based AI interviewer, runs recorded, adaptive spoken interviews (with optional coding exercises and automated proctoring) and returns per-skill proficiency ratings, soft-skill ratings and a proctoring score; micro1 uses it to certify experts for its own AI-training talent network, and employers can use it through a client portal and API.
§ The record
HeroHunt.ai is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, micro1 under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only micro1 is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HeroHunt.ai | micro1 |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | NL | US |
| Founded | 2021 | 2022 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 60% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HeroHunt.ai 20 · micro1 50
6.0 weighted points to micro1
18% weight · 78% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HeroHunt.ai 10 · micro1 20
1.8 weighted points to micro1
12% weight · 86% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HeroHunt.ai 55 · micro1 48
0.8 weighted points to HeroHunt.ai
15% weight · 94% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HeroHunt.ai 27 · micro1 22
0.8 weighted points to HeroHunt.ai
12% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HeroHunt.ai 28 · micro1 25
0.4 weighted points to HeroHunt.ai
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HeroHunt.ai 48 · micro1 45
0.2 weighted points to HeroHunt.ai
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -5.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -6 beside that -5.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HeroHunt.ai minus micro1.
| Category | Weight | HeroHunt.ai | micro1 | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 20 | 50 | -30 | -6.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 10 | 20 | -10 | -1.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 27 | 22 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 45 | - | - |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 48 | +7 | +0.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 25 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 48 | 45 | +3 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 30 (F) | 36 (F) | -6 | -5.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HeroHunt.ai | micro1 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | — | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 25 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 25 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
HeroHunt.ai has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; micro1 has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HeroHunt.ai and micro1 sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 65 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 32 for HeroHunt.ai, across 2 distinct source domains, and 33 for micro1, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HeroHunt.ai last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- micro1 last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next