§ The result
Pinpoint leads HeroHunt.ai on all 7 criteria.
Rubric v1.0 puts 27 points between Pinpoint (ATS-integrated) and HeroHunt.ai (Sourcing): 57 for Pinpoint, 30 for HeroHunt.ai. Pinpoint leads every one of the 7 criteria and 4 of them by 20 raw points or more, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them; HeroHunt.ai leads none. The advantage Pinpoint holds is spread out: Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (HeroHunt.ai 20, Pinpoint 72, 20% weight), yet it supplies only 39% of the weighted points Pinpoint gains across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
HeroHunt.ai
HeroHunt.ai's AI Recruiter (launched as Uwi) searches a claimed 1 billion+ professional profiles, scores and ranks them against a job description with language models, and sends AI-personalised outreach to the candidates a user approves.
Vendor profile
Pinpoint
Pinpoint is an applicant tracking system for in-house talent teams that layers AI-assisted screening onto core hiring workflows - candidate match scores, AI filters, anonymized screening, an interview notetaker, and a hiring copilot for outreach and rejections.
§ The record
HeroHunt.ai is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Pinpoint under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | HeroHunt.ai | Pinpoint |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | NL | JE |
| Founded | 2021 | 2017 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 39% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HeroHunt.ai 20 · Pinpoint 72
10.4 weighted points to Pinpoint
18% weight · 61% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HeroHunt.ai 10 · Pinpoint 42
5.8 weighted points to Pinpoint
15% weight · 74% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HeroHunt.ai 45 · Pinpoint 68
3.4 weighted points to Pinpoint
12% weight · 84% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HeroHunt.ai 28 · Pinpoint 52
2.9 weighted points to Pinpoint
15% weight · 91% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HeroHunt.ai 27 · Pinpoint 38
1.6 weighted points to Pinpoint
8% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HeroHunt.ai 48 · Pinpoint 66
1.4 weighted points to Pinpoint
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HeroHunt.ai 55 · Pinpoint 64
1.1 weighted points to Pinpoint
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -26.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 26.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -27 beside that -26.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HeroHunt.ai minus Pinpoint.
| Category | Weight | HeroHunt.ai | Pinpoint | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 20 | 72 | -52 | -10.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 10 | 42 | -32 | -5.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 27 | 38 | -11 | -1.6 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 68 | -23 | -3.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 64 | -9 | -1.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 52 | -24 | -2.9 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 48 | 66 | -18 | -1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 30 (F) | 57 (F) | -27 | -26.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HeroHunt.ai | Pinpoint | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 25 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 18 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HeroHunt.ai has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Pinpoint has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HeroHunt.ai sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 52 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 32 for HeroHunt.ai, across 2 distinct source domains, and 20 for Pinpoint, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HeroHunt.ai last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Pinpoint last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next