§ The result
Saville Assessment leads HeroHunt.ai on 6 of the 7 criteria.
Saville Assessment finishes 18 points clear of HeroHunt.ai under rubric v1.0 — 48 against 30 — across the Assessment and Sourcing cohorts. Saville Assessment leads 6 of the 7 criteria and the remaining criterion is level, so HeroHunt.ai is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 6 Saville Assessment leads is Data Governance Disclosure, HeroHunt.ai 45 to Saville Assessment 55. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap (HeroHunt.ai 10, Saville Assessment 42) but not the heaviest weighted swing, which is Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (HeroHunt.ai 20, Saville Assessment 50), 35% of the weighted advantage Saville Assessment builds across the 6 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
HeroHunt.ai
HeroHunt.ai's AI Recruiter (launched as Uwi) searches a claimed 1 billion+ professional profiles, scores and ranks them against a job description with language models, and sends AI-personalised outreach to the candidates a user approves.
Vendor profile
Saville Assessment
Saville Assessment publishes the Wave personality questionnaires, Swift aptitude tests and situational judgment tests. They are scored automatically against norm groups and delivered through the Oasys platform, the Wave Connect hiring platform (which uses AI to build role profiles from job descriptions) and a two-minute Screener that returns a fit band into the employer's ATS.
§ The record
HeroHunt.ai is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Saville Assessment under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only Saville Assessment is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HeroHunt.ai | Saville Assessment |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | NL | GB |
| Founded | 2021 | 2004 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 35% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HeroHunt.ai 20 · Saville Assessment 50
6.0 weighted points to Saville Assessment
18% weight · 68% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HeroHunt.ai 10 · Saville Assessment 42
5.8 weighted points to Saville Assessment
15% weight · 79% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HeroHunt.ai 27 · Saville Assessment 40
1.9 weighted points to Saville Assessment
15% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HeroHunt.ai 45 · Saville Assessment 55
1.5 weighted points to Saville Assessment
12% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HeroHunt.ai 28 · Saville Assessment 38
1.2 weighted points to Saville Assessment
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HeroHunt.ai 48 · Saville Assessment 60
1.0 weighted points to Saville Assessment
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -17.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 17.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -18 beside that -17.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HeroHunt.ai minus Saville Assessment.
| Category | Weight | HeroHunt.ai | Saville Assessment | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 20 | 50 | -30 | -6.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 10 | 42 | -32 | -5.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 27 | 40 | -13 | -1.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 55 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 55 | - | - |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 38 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 48 | 60 | -12 | -1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 30 (F) | 48 (F) | -18 | -17.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HeroHunt.ai | Saville Assessment | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | — | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 25 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 34 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
HeroHunt.ai has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Saville Assessment has 40 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HeroHunt.ai and Saville Assessment sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 72 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 32 for HeroHunt.ai, across 2 distinct source domains, and 40 for Saville Assessment, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HeroHunt.ai last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Saville Assessment last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next