§ The result
Teamtailor leads HeroHunt.ai by 17 points.
Under rubric v1.0, Teamtailor (ATS-integrated) opens a 17-point lead on HeroHunt.ai (Sourcing), 47 to 30. The 7 criteria split 6 to 1 in favour of Teamtailor: Teamtailor is ahead on Article 11 Technical Documentation and HeroHunt.ai on Human Oversight Design. The advantage Teamtailor holds is spread out: Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (HeroHunt.ai 20, Teamtailor 50, 20% weight), yet it supplies only 36% of the weighted points Teamtailor gains across the 6 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
HeroHunt.ai
HeroHunt.ai's AI Recruiter (launched as Uwi) searches a claimed 1 billion+ professional profiles, scores and ranks them against a job description with language models, and sends AI-personalised outreach to the candidates a user approves.
Vendor profile
Teamtailor
Teamtailor is a Stockholm-based applicant tracking and employer-branding platform whose OpenAI-powered "Co-pilot" assists recruiters with candidate screening, resume and interview summaries, talent-pool matching, interview-question generation, and AI-assisted job-ad and content writing.
§ The record
HeroHunt.ai is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Teamtailor under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | HeroHunt.ai | Teamtailor |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | NL | SE |
| Founded | 2021 | 2013 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 36% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HeroHunt.ai 20 · Teamtailor 50
6.0 weighted points to Teamtailor
18% weight · 57% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HeroHunt.ai 10 · Teamtailor 30
3.6 weighted points to Teamtailor
15% weight · 71% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HeroHunt.ai 27 · Teamtailor 42
2.3 weighted points to Teamtailor
15% weight · 83% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HeroHunt.ai 45 · Teamtailor 58
1.9 weighted points to Teamtailor
12% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HeroHunt.ai 28 · Teamtailor 42
1.7 weighted points to Teamtailor
8% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HeroHunt.ai 48 · Teamtailor 62
1.1 weighted points to Teamtailor
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HeroHunt.ai 55 · Teamtailor 54
0.1 weighted points to HeroHunt.ai
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -16.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 16.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -17 beside that -16.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HeroHunt.ai minus Teamtailor.
| Category | Weight | HeroHunt.ai | Teamtailor | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 20 | 50 | -30 | -6.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 10 | 30 | -20 | -3.6 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 27 | 42 | -15 | -2.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 58 | -13 | -1.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 54 | +1 | +0.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 42 | -14 | -1.7 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 48 | 62 | -14 | -1.1 |
| Total | 100% | 30 (F) | 47 (F) | -17 | -16.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HeroHunt.ai | Teamtailor | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 25 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 14 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
HeroHunt.ai has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Teamtailor has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 14 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HeroHunt.ai sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 52 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 32 for HeroHunt.ai, across 2 distinct source domains, and 20 for Teamtailor, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HeroHunt.ai last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Teamtailor last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next