§ The result
Tribepad leads HeroHunt.ai on all 7 criteria.
Rubric v1.0 puts 26 points between Tribepad (ATS-integrated) and HeroHunt.ai (Sourcing): 56 for Tribepad, 30 for HeroHunt.ai. Tribepad leads every one of the 7 criteria and 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; HeroHunt.ai leads none. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (HeroHunt.ai 10, Tribepad 78) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 47% of the weighted advantage Tribepad holds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
HeroHunt.ai
HeroHunt.ai's AI Recruiter (launched as Uwi) searches a claimed 1 billion+ professional profiles, scores and ranks them against a job description with language models, and sends AI-personalised outreach to the candidates a user approves.
Vendor profile
Tribepad
Tribepad is a UK applicant tracking system whose built-in Sidekick AI assistant scores and ranks applicants against recruiter-weighted skills and generates candidate summaries, SWOT analyses, job descriptions, salary suggestions and interview questions.
§ The record
HeroHunt.ai is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Tribepad under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | HeroHunt.ai | Tribepad |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | NL | GB |
| Founded | 2021 | 2008 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 47% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HeroHunt.ai 10 · Tribepad 78
12.2 weighted points to Tribepad
20% weight · 75% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HeroHunt.ai 20 · Tribepad 56
7.2 weighted points to Tribepad
12% weight · 87% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HeroHunt.ai 28 · Tribepad 54
3.1 weighted points to Tribepad
15% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HeroHunt.ai 45 · Tribepad 56
1.6 weighted points to Tribepad
8% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HeroHunt.ai 48 · Tribepad 58
0.8 weighted points to Tribepad
15% weight · 99% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HeroHunt.ai 27 · Tribepad 30
0.4 weighted points to Tribepad
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HeroHunt.ai 55 · Tribepad 58
0.4 weighted points to Tribepad
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -25.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 25.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -26 beside that -25.8.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HeroHunt.ai minus Tribepad.
| Category | Weight | HeroHunt.ai | Tribepad | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 20 | 56 | -36 | -7.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 10 | 78 | -68 | -12.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 27 | 30 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 56 | -11 | -1.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 58 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 54 | -26 | -3.1 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 48 | 58 | -10 | -0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 30 (F) | 56 (F) | -26 | -25.8 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HeroHunt.ai | Tribepad | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | — | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 25 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 28 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
HeroHunt.ai has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Tribepad has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HeroHunt.ai and Tribepad sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 64 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 32 for HeroHunt.ai, across 2 distinct source domains, and 32 for Tribepad, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HeroHunt.ai last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Tribepad last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next