§ The result
Turing takes the total, HeroHunt.ai takes more of the criteria.
Turing scores 36 and HeroHunt.ai 30 under rubric v1.0, a 6-point gap across the Assessment and Sourcing cohorts. HeroHunt.ai leads more of the criteria than Turing — 4 to 2 — but Article 11 Technical Documentation, which Turing leads, carries 20% of the rubric, and the weighted sum still falls to Turing. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (HeroHunt.ai 20, Turing 42) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 58% of the weighted advantage Turing holds across the 2 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
HeroHunt.ai
HeroHunt.ai's AI Recruiter (launched as Uwi) searches a claimed 1 billion+ professional profiles, scores and ranks them against a job description with language models, and sends AI-personalised outreach to the candidates a user approves.
Vendor profile
Turing
Turing is an AI-powered talent platform that vets software engineers through automated multi-stage technical assessments and uses machine-learned ranking to score, match, and place them with client companies.
§ The record
HeroHunt.ai is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Turing under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only Turing is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HeroHunt.ai | Turing |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | NL | US |
| Founded | 2021 | 2018 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 47% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HeroHunt.ai 20 · Turing 42
4.4 weighted points to Turing
18% weight · 81% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HeroHunt.ai 10 · Turing 28
3.2 weighted points to Turing
12% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HeroHunt.ai 55 · Turing 45
1.2 weighted points to HeroHunt.ai
15% weight · 97% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HeroHunt.ai 27 · Turing 25
0.3 weighted points to HeroHunt.ai
15% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HeroHunt.ai 45 · Turing 44
0.1 weighted points to HeroHunt.ai
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HeroHunt.ai 28 · Turing 27
0.1 weighted points to HeroHunt.ai
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -5.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -6 beside that -5.9.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HeroHunt.ai minus Turing.
| Category | Weight | HeroHunt.ai | Turing | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 20 | 42 | -22 | -4.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 10 | 28 | -18 | -3.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 27 | 25 | +2 | +0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 44 | +1 | +0.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 45 | +10 | +1.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 27 | +1 | +0.1 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 48 | 48 | - | - |
| Total | 100% | 30 (F) | 36 (F) | -6 | -5.9 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HeroHunt.ai | Turing | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 25 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 8 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HeroHunt.ai has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Turing has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 8 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HeroHunt.ai sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 46 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 32 for HeroHunt.ai, across 2 distinct source domains, and 14 for Turing, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HeroHunt.ai last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Turing last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next