§ The result
Wonderlic leads HeroHunt.ai by 13 points.
Wonderlic sits 13 points above HeroHunt.ai under rubric v1.0 — 43 against 30 — with Wonderlic filed under Assessment and HeroHunt.ai under Sourcing. HeroHunt.ai takes 3 of the 7 criteria, Data Governance Disclosure among them, against 4 for Wonderlic, whose share includes Bias Audit Transparency. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (HeroHunt.ai 10, Wonderlic 48) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 48% of the weighted advantage Wonderlic holds across the 4 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
HeroHunt.ai
HeroHunt.ai's AI Recruiter (launched as Uwi) searches a claimed 1 billion+ professional profiles, scores and ranks them against a job description with language models, and sends AI-personalised outreach to the candidates a user approves.
Vendor profile
Wonderlic
Wonderlic Select (formerly WonScore) is a pre-employment assessment that combines cognitive ability, personality, and motivation tests to score and rank candidates for job fit.
§ The record
HeroHunt.ai is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Wonderlic under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only Wonderlic is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HeroHunt.ai | Wonderlic |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | NL | US |
| Founded | 2021 | 1937 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 42% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HeroHunt.ai 10 · Wonderlic 48
6.8 weighted points to Wonderlic
20% weight · 82% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HeroHunt.ai 20 · Wonderlic 52
6.4 weighted points to Wonderlic
15% weight · 89% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HeroHunt.ai 45 · Wonderlic 38
1.1 weighted points to HeroHunt.ai
12% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HeroHunt.ai 28 · Wonderlic 33
0.6 weighted points to Wonderlic
8% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HeroHunt.ai 48 · Wonderlic 55
0.6 weighted points to Wonderlic
12% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HeroHunt.ai 55 · Wonderlic 52
0.4 weighted points to HeroHunt.ai
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HeroHunt.ai 27 · Wonderlic 25
0.3 weighted points to HeroHunt.ai
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -12.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 16.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -13 beside that -12.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HeroHunt.ai minus Wonderlic.
| Category | Weight | HeroHunt.ai | Wonderlic | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 20 | 52 | -32 | -6.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 10 | 48 | -38 | -6.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 27 | 25 | +2 | +0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 38 | +7 | +1.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 52 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 33 | -5 | -0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 48 | 55 | -7 | -0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 30 (F) | 43 (F) | -13 | -12.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HeroHunt.ai | Wonderlic | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 25 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 9 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HeroHunt.ai has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Wonderlic has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HeroHunt.ai sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 47 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 32 for HeroHunt.ai, across 2 distinct source domains, and 15 for Wonderlic, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HeroHunt.ai last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Wonderlic last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next