§ The result
HeyMilo leads HireLogic on all 7 criteria.
Rubric v1.0 puts 27 points between HeyMilo (Screening) and HireLogic (Video interview): 61 (D) for HeyMilo, 34 (F) for HireLogic. Of the 7 criteria HireLogic wins none, and the narrowest lead HeyMilo holds is on Article 11 Technical Documentation, HeyMilo 58 to HireLogic 42. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (HeyMilo 83, HireLogic 15) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 47% of the weighted advantage HeyMilo holds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
HeyMilo
HeyMilo is an AI recruiter for high-volume hiring whose voice and video AI agent conducts and scores async and live conversational screening interviews against recruiter-defined rubrics and syncs results to the customer's ATS.
Vendor profile
HireLogic
HireLogic joins phone, video and in-person interviews to transcribe them and generate AI notes, job-description coverage, candidate insights and flags for potentially discriminatory interviewer questions, and also offers an asynchronous AI interview agent that scores candidates on relevance and depth of knowledge.
§ The record
HeyMilo is filed under Screening AI, HireLogic under Video interview AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HeyMilo | HireLogic |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Low |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2023 | Not recorded |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 47% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HeyMilo 83 · HireLogic 15
12.2 weighted points to HeyMilo
20% weight · 59% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HeyMilo 58 · HireLogic 42
3.2 weighted points to HeyMilo
15% weight · 68% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HeyMilo 42 · HireLogic 25
2.5 weighted points to HeyMilo
15% weight · 78% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HeyMilo 62 · HireLogic 45
2.5 weighted points to HeyMilo
12% weight · 86% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HeyMilo 46 · HireLogic 28
2.2 weighted points to HeyMilo
12% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HeyMilo 64 · HireLogic 48
1.9 weighted points to HeyMilo
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HeyMilo 66 · HireLogic 45
1.7 weighted points to HeyMilo
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +26.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 26.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +27 beside that +26.3.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HeyMilo minus HireLogic.
| Category | Weight | HeyMilo | HireLogic | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 58 | 42 | +16 | +3.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 83 | 15 | +68 | +12.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 42 | 25 | +17 | +2.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 62 | 45 | +17 | +2.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 64 | 48 | +16 | +1.9 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 46 | 28 | +18 | +2.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 66 | 45 | +21 | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 61 (D) | 34 (F) | +27 | +26.3 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HeyMilo | HireLogic | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 18 | 3 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 23 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HeyMilo has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; HireLogic has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HeyMilo sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 50 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 21 for HeyMilo, across 2 distinct source domains, and 29 for HireLogic, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HeyMilo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HireLogic last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next