§ The result
HeyMilo leads Pulsifi on all 7 criteria.
Rubric v1.0 puts 28 points between HeyMilo (Screening) and Pulsifi (Assessment): 61 (D) for HeyMilo, 33 (F) for Pulsifi. HeyMilo leads every one of the 7 criteria and 4 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; Pulsifi leads none. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (HeyMilo 83, Pulsifi 20) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 41% of the weighted advantage HeyMilo holds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
HeyMilo
HeyMilo is an AI recruiter for high-volume hiring whose voice and video AI agent conducts and scores async and live conversational screening interviews against recruiter-defined rubrics and syncs results to the customer's ATS.
Vendor profile
Pulsifi
Pulsifi gives candidates and employees 0-100 Role Fit and Organizational Fit scores that combine personality, work-interest, work-culture and cognitive assessments with AI resume and skills analysis, and uses the scores to rank people for hiring, internal mobility and succession.
§ The record
HeyMilo is filed under Screening AI, Pulsifi under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Video interview.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HeyMilo | Pulsifi |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | SG |
| Founded | 2023 | 2017 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 41% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HeyMilo 83 · Pulsifi 20
11.3 weighted points to HeyMilo
20% weight · 61% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HeyMilo 58 · Pulsifi 30
5.6 weighted points to HeyMilo
15% weight · 73% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HeyMilo 62 · Pulsifi 40
3.3 weighted points to HeyMilo
15% weight · 82% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HeyMilo 42 · Pulsifi 25
2.5 weighted points to HeyMilo
12% weight · 90% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HeyMilo 46 · Pulsifi 28
2.2 weighted points to HeyMilo
8% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HeyMilo 66 · Pulsifi 46
1.6 weighted points to HeyMilo
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HeyMilo 64 · Pulsifi 55
1.1 weighted points to HeyMilo
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +27.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 27.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +28 beside that +27.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HeyMilo minus Pulsifi.
| Category | Weight | HeyMilo | Pulsifi | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 58 | 30 | +28 | +5.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 83 | 20 | +63 | +11.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 42 | 25 | +17 | +2.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 62 | 40 | +22 | +3.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 64 | 55 | +9 | +1.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 46 | 28 | +18 | +2.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 66 | 46 | +20 | +1.6 |
| Total | 100% | 61 (D) | 33 (F) | +28 | +27.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HeyMilo | Pulsifi | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 3 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 18 | 3 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 26 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HeyMilo has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; Pulsifi has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HeyMilo sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 54 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 21 for HeyMilo, across 2 distinct source domains, and 33 for Pulsifi, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HeyMilo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Pulsifi last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next