§ The result
HeyMilo leads Radancy on all 7 criteria.
HeyMilo finishes 20 points clear of Radancy under rubric v1.0 — 61 (D) against 41 (F) — across the Screening and Sourcing cohorts. HeyMilo leads every one of the 7 criteria, Radancy none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Data Governance Disclosure, HeyMilo 62 to Radancy 58. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — HeyMilo 83, Radancy 20 — and at an 18% weight it carries 57% of the weighted advantage HeyMilo holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
HeyMilo
HeyMilo is an AI recruiter for high-volume hiring whose voice and video AI agent conducts and scores async and live conversational screening interviews against recruiter-defined rubrics and syncs results to the customer's ATS.
Vendor profile
Radancy
Radancy is an enterprise talent acquisition cloud combining recruitment marketing, career sites and CRM with agentic AI that sources, screens, scores, ranks and schedules candidates, including one-way video screening inherited from its myInterview acquisition.
§ The record
HeyMilo is filed under Screening AI, Radancy under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Video interview.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HeyMilo | Radancy |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2023 | 2006 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 57% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HeyMilo 83 · Radancy 20
11.3 weighted points to HeyMilo
20% weight · 74% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HeyMilo 58 · Radancy 42
3.2 weighted points to HeyMilo
15% weight · 84% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HeyMilo 42 · Radancy 28
2.1 weighted points to HeyMilo
12% weight · 90% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HeyMilo 46 · Radancy 36
1.2 weighted points to HeyMilo
12% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HeyMilo 64 · Radancy 57
0.8 weighted points to HeyMilo
15% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HeyMilo 62 · Radancy 58
0.6 weighted points to HeyMilo
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HeyMilo 66 · Radancy 60
0.5 weighted points to HeyMilo
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +19.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 19.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +20 beside that +19.8.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HeyMilo minus Radancy.
| Category | Weight | HeyMilo | Radancy | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 58 | 42 | +16 | +3.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 83 | 20 | +63 | +11.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 42 | 28 | +14 | +2.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 62 | 58 | +4 | +0.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 64 | 57 | +7 | +0.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 46 | 36 | +10 | +1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 66 | 60 | +6 | +0.5 |
| Total | 100% | 61 (D) | 41 (F) | +20 | +19.8 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HeyMilo | Radancy | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 18 | 3 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 16 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HeyMilo has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; Radancy has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HeyMilo sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 43 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 21 for HeyMilo, across 2 distinct source domains, and 22 for Radancy, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HeyMilo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Radancy last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next