HomeCompareHighMatch vs HiredScore

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

HighMatch vs HiredScore

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

HiredScore leads HighMatch by 9 points.

HiredScore scores 52 and HighMatch 43 under rubric v1.0, a 9-point gap across the Sourcing and Assessment cohorts. HighMatch takes 1 of the 7 criteria, Post-Market Monitoring among them, against 4 for HiredScore, whose share includes Bias Audit Transparency, and 2 are level. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (HighMatch 30, HiredScore 55) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 49% of the weighted advantage HiredScore holds across the 4 criteria it leads.

§ The record

HighMatch is filed under Assessment AI, HiredScore under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only HighMatch is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordHighMatchHiredScore
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20052012

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 46% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    HighMatch 30 · HiredScore 55

    4.5 weighted points to HiredScore

  2. 20% weight · 88% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    HighMatch 45 · HiredScore 65

    4.0 weighted points to HiredScore

  3. 12% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    HighMatch 40 · HiredScore 35

    0.6 weighted points to HighMatch

  4. 15% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    HighMatch 52 · HiredScore 55

    0.4 weighted points to HiredScore

  5. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    HighMatch 58 · HiredScore 60

    0.2 weighted points to HiredScore

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to -8.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -9 beside that -8.5.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is HighMatch minus HiredScore.

CategoryWeightHighMatchHiredScoreΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4565-20-4.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%3055-25-4.5
FRIA Support15%3030--
Data Governance Disclosure15%5255-3-0.4
Human Oversight Design12%6060--
Post-Market Monitoring12%4035+5+0.6
Customer Documentation8%5860-2-0.2
Total100%43 (F)52 (F)-9-8.5

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightHighMatchHiredScore
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%60Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%41Sources on the vendor's own domain10Audit reportSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain01—
Data Governance Disclosure15%50Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain10Sources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domain10Sources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain01—
Customer Documentation8%41Sources on the vendor's own domain10Sources on a separate domain
All criteria100%314Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain72Audit reportSources on a separate domain

HighMatch has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 31 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; HiredScore has 9 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 7 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HighMatch and HiredScore sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 44 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 35 for HighMatch, across 2 distinct source domains, and 9 for HiredScore, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
HighMatch last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HiredScore last reviewed
May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.