§ The result
HiPeople leads Intervue.io on all 7 criteria.
HiPeople (Assessment) and Intervue.io (Video interview) are 30 points apart under rubric v1.0, 61 (D) for HiPeople against 31 (F) for Intervue.io. Intervue.io leads none of the 7 criteria, and HiPeople is ahead on 4 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — HiPeople 84, Intervue.io 12 — and at an 18% weight it carries 42% of the weighted advantage HiPeople holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
HiPeople
HiPeople is a Berlin-based hiring platform combining a 400+ test skills and personality assessment library, automated AI reference checks, AI resume/application screening that scores candidates against job criteria, and AI screening calls.
Vendor profile
Intervue.io
Intervue.io runs outsourced, recorded technical interviews through a network of vetted engineer-interviewers and also sells AI screening: an agent that phones or interviews candidates by voice or avatar and returns scored summaries, AI scoring of resumes and recorded video answers, and a built-in ATS.
§ The record
HiPeople is filed under Assessment AI, Intervue.io under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HiPeople | Intervue.io |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | DE | IN |
| Founded | 2019 | 2020 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 42% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HiPeople 84 · Intervue.io 12
13.0 weighted points to HiPeople
20% weight · 65% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HiPeople 62 · Intervue.io 28
6.8 weighted points to HiPeople
12% weight · 76% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HiPeople 60 · Intervue.io 30
3.6 weighted points to HiPeople
15% weight · 86% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HiPeople 58 · Intervue.io 38
3.0 weighted points to HiPeople
15% weight · 93% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HiPeople 35 · Intervue.io 22
1.9 weighted points to HiPeople
8% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HiPeople 66 · Intervue.io 50
1.3 weighted points to HiPeople
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HiPeople 62 · Intervue.io 54
1.0 weighted points to HiPeople
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +30.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 30.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +30 beside that +30.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HiPeople minus Intervue.io.
| Category | Weight | HiPeople | Intervue.io | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 62 | 28 | +34 | +6.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 84 | 12 | +72 | +13.0 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 22 | +13 | +1.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 38 | +20 | +3.0 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 54 | +8 | +1.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 60 | 30 | +30 | +3.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 66 | 50 | +16 | +1.3 |
| Total | 100% | 61 (D) | 31 (F) | +30 | +30.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HiPeople | Intervue.io | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 5 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 5 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 27 | 8 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 30 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
HiPeople has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Intervue.io has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HiPeople and Intervue.io sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 68 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for HiPeople, across 3 distinct source domains, and 37 for Intervue.io, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HiPeople last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Intervue.io last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next