Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
HiPeople vs Radancy
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Export comparison (CSV)Pro→Vendor profile
HiPeople
HiPeople is a Berlin-based hiring platform combining a 400+ test skills and personality assessment library, automated AI reference checks, AI resume/application screening that scores candidates against job criteria, and AI screening calls.
Vendor profile
Radancy
Radancy is an enterprise talent acquisition cloud combining recruitment marketing, career sites and CRM with agentic AI that sources, screens, scores, ranks and schedules candidates, including one-way video screening inherited from its myInterview acquisition.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HiPeople minus Radancy.
| Category | Weight | HiPeople | Radancy | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 62 | 42 | +20 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 84 | 20 | +64 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 28 | +7 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 58 | — |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 57 | +5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 60 | 36 | +24 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 66 | 60 | +6 |
| Total | 100% | 61 (D) | 41 (F) | +20 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
HiPeople
31 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 16
- public statement
- 2
- absence
- 8
- audit report
- 5
Evidence count
Radancy
22 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 14
- absence
- 6
- public statement
- 1
- integration
- 1