§ The result
HiredScore leads HirePro on 6 of the 7 criteria.
HiredScore sits 14 points above HirePro under rubric v1.0 — 52 against 38 — with HiredScore filed under Sourcing and HirePro under Screening. HiredScore leads 6 of the 7 criteria and the remaining criterion is level, so HirePro is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 6 HiredScore leads is FRIA Support, HiredScore 30 to HirePro 25. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (HiredScore 65, HirePro 30) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 51% of the weighted advantage HiredScore holds across the 6 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
HiredScore
AI-driven talent orchestration layer that ranks and routes candidates within an existing ATS. Acquired by Workday in 2024.
Vendor profile
HirePro
HirePro's AI Recruiter matches resumes to a job, shortlists candidates and runs AI-led interviews that score each answer with written reasoning and a fraud and identity check, alongside proctored assessments, video interviews and campus-hiring workflows.
§ The record
HiredScore is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, HirePro under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only HirePro is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HiredScore | HirePro |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | IN |
| Founded | 2012 | 2004 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 51% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HiredScore 65 · HirePro 30
7.0 weighted points to HiredScore
18% weight · 80% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HiredScore 55 · HirePro 33
4.0 weighted points to HiredScore
15% weight · 85% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HiredScore 30 · HirePro 25
0.8 weighted points to HiredScore
15% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HiredScore 55 · HirePro 50
0.8 weighted points to HiredScore
8% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HiredScore 60 · HirePro 52
0.6 weighted points to HiredScore
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HiredScore 60 · HirePro 55
0.6 weighted points to HiredScore
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +13.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 13.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +14 beside that +13.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HiredScore minus HirePro.
| Category | Weight | HiredScore | HirePro | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 65 | 30 | +35 | +7.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 55 | 33 | +22 | +4.0 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 25 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 50 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 55 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 35 | - | - |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 52 | +8 | +0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 52 (F) | 38 (F) | +14 | +13.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HiredScore | HirePro | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 0 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 7 | 2 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 21 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HiredScore has 9 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 7 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; HirePro has 27 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HiredScore sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 36 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 9 for HiredScore, across 1 distinct source domain, and 27 for HirePro, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HiredScore last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HirePro last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next