§ The result
4 points separate iMocha and HiredScore.
iMocha (Assessment) edges HiredScore (Sourcing) by 4 points under rubric v1.0, 56 to 52. iMocha leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Data Governance Disclosure, while HiredScore leads 1, including Bias Audit Transparency. The heaviest weighted swing runs the other way — HiredScore takes Bias Audit Transparency at 18%, HiredScore 55 to iMocha 44, 100% of the weighted advantage HiredScore holds — while the widest raw gap sits on Post-Market Monitoring, HiredScore 35 to iMocha 48.
Vendor profile
HiredScore
AI-driven talent orchestration layer that ranks and routes candidates within an existing ATS. Acquired by Workday in 2024.
Vendor profile
iMocha
iMocha is an AI-powered skills assessment and skills-intelligence platform that evaluates candidates and employees across technical, cognitive, coding, and soft skills for hiring and internal talent management, including AI-based coding simulators and an AI video interviewer (Tara).
§ The record
HiredScore is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, iMocha under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only iMocha is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HiredScore | iMocha |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | IN |
| Founded | 2012 | 2015 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 25% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HiredScore 55 · iMocha 44
2.0 weighted points to HiredScore
15% weight · 46% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HiredScore 55 · iMocha 66
1.6 weighted points to iMocha
12% weight · 65% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HiredScore 35 · iMocha 48
1.6 weighted points to iMocha
15% weight · 80% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HiredScore 30 · iMocha 38
1.2 weighted points to iMocha
20% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HiredScore 65 · iMocha 68
0.6 weighted points to iMocha
12% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HiredScore 60 · iMocha 64
0.5 weighted points to iMocha
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HiredScore 60 · iMocha 66
0.5 weighted points to iMocha
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -4.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -4 beside that -4.0.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HiredScore minus iMocha.
| Category | Weight | HiredScore | iMocha | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 65 | 68 | -3 | -0.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 55 | 44 | +11 | +2.0 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 38 | -8 | -1.2 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 66 | -11 | -1.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 64 | -4 | -0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 48 | -13 | -1.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 66 | -6 | -0.5 |
| Total | 100% | 52 (F) | 56 (F) | -4 | -4.0 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HiredScore | iMocha | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 0 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 7 | 2 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 21 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
HiredScore has 9 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 7 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; iMocha has 26 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HiredScore and iMocha sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 35 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 9 for HiredScore, across 1 distinct source domain, and 26 for iMocha, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HiredScore last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- iMocha last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next