§ The result
HiredScore leads JobDiva on all 7 criteria.
HiredScore finishes 23 points clear of JobDiva under rubric v1.0 — 52 against 29 — across the Sourcing and ATS-integrated cohorts. HiredScore leads every one of the 7 criteria and 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them; JobDiva leads none. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap (HiredScore 55, JobDiva 15) but not the heaviest weighted swing, which is Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (HiredScore 65, JobDiva 28), 32% of the weighted advantage HiredScore builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
HiredScore
AI-driven talent orchestration layer that ranks and routes candidates within an existing ATS. Acquired by Workday in 2024.
Vendor profile
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
§ The record
HiredScore is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, JobDiva under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144.
| Record | HiredScore | JobDiva |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2012 | 2003 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 32% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HiredScore 65 · JobDiva 28
7.4 weighted points to HiredScore
18% weight · 64% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HiredScore 55 · JobDiva 15
7.2 weighted points to HiredScore
15% weight · 75% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HiredScore 55 · JobDiva 38
2.5 weighted points to HiredScore
12% weight · 86% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HiredScore 60 · JobDiva 40
2.4 weighted points to HiredScore
8% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HiredScore 60 · JobDiva 42
1.4 weighted points to HiredScore
15% weight · 97% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HiredScore 30 · JobDiva 22
1.2 weighted points to HiredScore
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HiredScore 35 · JobDiva 30
0.6 weighted points to HiredScore
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +22.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 22.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +23 beside that +22.8.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HiredScore minus JobDiva.
| Category | Weight | HiredScore | JobDiva | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 65 | 28 | +37 | +7.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 55 | 15 | +40 | +7.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 22 | +8 | +1.2 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 38 | +17 | +2.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 40 | +20 | +2.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 30 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 42 | +18 | +1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 52 (F) | 29 (F) | +23 | +22.8 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HiredScore | JobDiva | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 1 | 2 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 0 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 7 | 2 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HiredScore has 9 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 7 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HiredScore sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 37 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 9 for HiredScore, across 1 distinct source domain, and 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HiredScore last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next