HomeCompareHiredScore vs Recruit CRM

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

HiredScore vs Recruit CRM

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

HiredScore leads Recruit CRM by 12 points.

HiredScore sits 12 points above Recruit CRM under rubric v1.0 — 52 against 40 — with HiredScore filed under Sourcing and Recruit CRM under ATS-integrated. The 7 criteria split 4 to 2 in favour of HiredScore, with 1 level: HiredScore is ahead on Bias Audit Transparency and Recruit CRM on Post-Market Monitoring. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (HiredScore 55, Recruit CRM 20) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 49% of the weighted advantage HiredScore holds across the 4 criteria it leads.

§ The record

HiredScore is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Recruit CRM under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144.

RecordHiredScoreRecruit CRM
Price tierEnterpriseLow
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded2012Not recorded

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 44% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    HiredScore 55 · Recruit CRM 20

    6.3 weighted points to HiredScore

  2. 20% weight · 87% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    HiredScore 65 · Recruit CRM 34

    6.2 weighted points to HiredScore

  3. 12% weight · 93% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    HiredScore 35 · Recruit CRM 42

    0.8 weighted points to Recruit CRM

  4. 15% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    HiredScore 30 · Recruit CRM 34

    0.6 weighted points to Recruit CRM

  5. 12% weight · 99% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    HiredScore 60 · Recruit CRM 58

    0.2 weighted points to HiredScore

  6. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    HiredScore 55 · Recruit CRM 54

    0.1 weighted points to HiredScore

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +11.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 14.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +12 beside that +11.5.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is HiredScore minus Recruit CRM.

CategoryWeightHiredScoreRecruit CRMΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%6534+31+6.2
Bias Audit Transparency18%5520+35+6.3
FRIA Support15%3034-4-0.6
Data Governance Disclosure15%5554+1+0.1
Human Oversight Design12%6058+2+0.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%3542-7-0.8
Customer Documentation8%6060--
Total100%52 (F)40 (F)+12+11.5

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightHiredScoreRecruit CRM
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%30Sources on a separate domain51Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%10Audit reportSources on a separate domain21—
FRIA Support15%01—21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%10Sources on a separate domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%10Sources on a separate domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%01—51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%10Sources on a separate domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%72Audit reportSources on a separate domain305Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

HiredScore has 9 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 7 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; Recruit CRM has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HiredScore and Recruit CRM sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 44 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 9 for HiredScore, across 1 distinct source domain, and 35 for Recruit CRM, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
HiredScore last reviewed
May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Recruit CRM last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.