§ The result
SmartRecruiters leads HiredScore on all 7 criteria.
SmartRecruiters sits 10 points above HiredScore under rubric v1.0 — 62 (D) against 52 (F) — with SmartRecruiters filed under ATS-integrated and HiredScore under Sourcing. SmartRecruiters leads every one of the 7 criteria, HiredScore none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Human Oversight Design, HiredScore 60 to SmartRecruiters 62. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — HiredScore 55, SmartRecruiters 78 — and at an 18% weight it carries 40% of the weighted advantage SmartRecruiters holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
HiredScore
AI-driven talent orchestration layer that ranks and routes candidates within an existing ATS. Acquired by Workday in 2024.
Vendor profile
SmartRecruiters
SmartRecruiters is an enterprise applicant tracking system and talent acquisition suite whose AI layer (the Winston assistant plus SmartAssistant/Winston Match) screens, ranks, and matches candidates to requisitions to support recruiter decisions.
§ The record
HiredScore is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, SmartRecruiters under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only SmartRecruiters is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | HiredScore | SmartRecruiters |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2012 | 2010 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 40% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HiredScore 55 · SmartRecruiters 78
4.1 weighted points to SmartRecruiters
15% weight · 61% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HiredScore 30 · SmartRecruiters 45
2.3 weighted points to SmartRecruiters
12% weight · 76% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HiredScore 35 · SmartRecruiters 48
1.6 weighted points to SmartRecruiters
15% weight · 86% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HiredScore 55 · SmartRecruiters 62
1.1 weighted points to SmartRecruiters
20% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HiredScore 65 · SmartRecruiters 70
1.0 weighted points to SmartRecruiters
12% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HiredScore 60 · SmartRecruiters 62
0.2 weighted points to SmartRecruiters
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HiredScore 60 · SmartRecruiters 63
0.2 weighted points to SmartRecruiters
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -10.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -10 beside that -10.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HiredScore minus SmartRecruiters.
| Category | Weight | HiredScore | SmartRecruiters | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 65 | 70 | -5 | -1.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 55 | 78 | -23 | -4.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 45 | -15 | -2.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 62 | -7 | -1.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 62 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 48 | -13 | -1.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 63 | -3 | -0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 52 (F) | 62 (D) | -10 | -10.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HiredScore | SmartRecruiters | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 1 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 7 | 2 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 11 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
HiredScore has 9 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 7 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; SmartRecruiters has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HiredScore and SmartRecruiters sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 22 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 9 for HiredScore, across 1 distinct source domain, and 13 for SmartRecruiters, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HiredScore last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- SmartRecruiters last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next