§ The result
hireEZ leads Intervue.io on all 7 criteria.
hireEZ sits 11 points above Intervue.io under rubric v1.0 — 42 against 31 — with hireEZ filed under Sourcing and Intervue.io under Video interview. hireEZ leads every one of the 7 criteria, Intervue.io none of them, and the closest of the 7 is FRIA Support, hireEZ 25 to Intervue.io 22. Data Governance Disclosure is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (hireEZ 60, Intervue.io 38, 15% weight), but it accounts for only 30% of the weighted advantage hireEZ holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
hireEZ
AI-powered outbound recruiting platform that sources, matches, screens, engages, and schedules candidates on top of a customer's existing ATS.
Vendor profile
Intervue.io
Intervue.io runs outsourced, recorded technical interviews through a network of vetted engineer-interviewers and also sells AI screening: an agent that phones or interviews candidates by voice or avatar and returns scored summaries, AI scoring of resumes and recorded video answers, and a built-in ATS.
§ The record
hireEZ is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Intervue.io under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Intervue.io is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | hireEZ | Intervue.io |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | IN |
| Founded | 2015 | 2020 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
15% weight · 30% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
hireEZ 60 · Intervue.io 38
3.3 weighted points to hireEZ
18% weight · 59% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
hireEZ 30 · Intervue.io 12
3.2 weighted points to hireEZ
20% weight · 77% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
hireEZ 38 · Intervue.io 28
2.0 weighted points to hireEZ
12% weight · 86% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
hireEZ 38 · Intervue.io 30
1.0 weighted points to hireEZ
8% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
hireEZ 58 · Intervue.io 50
0.6 weighted points to hireEZ
12% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
hireEZ 58 · Intervue.io 54
0.5 weighted points to hireEZ
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
hireEZ 25 · Intervue.io 22
0.4 weighted points to hireEZ
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +11.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +11 beside that +11.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is hireEZ minus Intervue.io.
| Category | Weight | hireEZ | Intervue.io | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 38 | 28 | +10 | +2.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 30 | 12 | +18 | +3.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 22 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 38 | +22 | +3.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 54 | +4 | +0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 38 | 30 | +8 | +1.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 50 | +8 | +0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 42 (F) | 31 (F) | +11 | +11.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | hireEZ | Intervue.io | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 5 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 9 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 30 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
hireEZ has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Intervue.io has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Intervue.io sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 51 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 14 for hireEZ, across 1 distinct source domain, and 37 for Intervue.io, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- hireEZ last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Intervue.io last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next