HomeComparehireEZ vs Recruitee

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

hireEZ vs Recruitee

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

hireEZ and Recruitee tie at 42.

hireEZ (Sourcing) and Recruitee (ATS-integrated) tie at 42 under rubric v1.0, arriving there from different criteria. hireEZ leads 1 of the 7 criteria and Recruitee 3, with 3 level, yet the two totals land on the same number. Data Governance Disclosure is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — hireEZ 60, Recruitee 52 — and at a 15% weight it carries 100% of the weighted advantage hireEZ holds across the 1 criterion on that side of the table.

§ The record

hireEZ is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Recruitee under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordhireEZRecruitee
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersUSNL
Founded20152015

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 15% weight · 47% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    hireEZ 60 · Recruitee 52

    1.2 weighted points to hireEZ

  2. 20% weight · 79% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    hireEZ 38 · Recruitee 42

    0.8 weighted points to Recruitee

  3. 15% weight · 91% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    hireEZ 25 · Recruitee 27

    0.3 weighted points to Recruitee

  4. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    hireEZ 38 · Recruitee 40

    0.2 weighted points to Recruitee

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 4 figures above sum to -0.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 2.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that -0.1.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is hireEZ minus Recruitee.

CategoryWeighthireEZRecruiteeΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3842-4-0.8
Bias Audit Transparency18%3030--
FRIA Support15%2527-2-0.3
Data Governance Disclosure15%6052+8+1.2
Human Oversight Design12%5858--
Post-Market Monitoring12%3840-2-0.2
Customer Documentation8%5858--
Total100%42 (F)42 (F)--0.1

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeighthireEZRecruitee
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%11Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%1111
FRIA Support15%0111Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%20Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%20Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%95Sources on the vendor's own domain147Sources on the vendor's own domain

hireEZ has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Recruitee has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 14 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 35 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 14 for hireEZ, across 1 distinct source domain, and 21 for Recruitee, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
hireEZ last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Recruitee last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.