The result

hireEZ and Recruitee tie at 42.

hireEZ (Sourcing) and Recruitee (ATS-integrated) tie at 42 under rubric v1.0, arriving there from different criteria. hireEZ leads 1 of the 7 criteria and Recruitee 3, with 3 level, yet the two totals land on the same number. One criterion, Data Governance Disclosure, is both the widest raw gap (hireEZ 60, Recruitee 52) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 15% weight it makes up 100% of the weighted advantage hireEZ holds across the 1 criterion it leads.

Criteria won

7 criteria

  • hireEZ1
  • Recruitee3
  • Level3
Widest raw gap
Data Governance Disclosure60 vs 52
Heaviest weighted swing
Data Governance Disclosure15% weight

Keep this comparison

Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.

Sent once, with links to turn on alerts for either vendor. No list.

The record

Categories, scope and company facts.

hireEZ is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Recruitee under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

RecordhireEZRecruitee
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersUSNL
Founded20152015

What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. Data Governance Disclosure

    15% weight47% of the movement so far

    hireEZ60
    Recruitee52

    1.2 weighted points to hireEZ

  2. Article 11 Technical Documentation

    20% weight79% of the movement so far

    hireEZ38
    Recruitee42

    0.8 weighted points to Recruitee

  3. FRIA Support

    15% weight91% of the movement so far

    hireEZ25
    Recruitee27

    0.3 weighted points to Recruitee

  4. Post-Market Monitoring

    12% weight100% of the movement so far

    hireEZ38
    Recruitee40

    0.2 weighted points to Recruitee

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 4 figures above sum to -0.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 2.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that -0.1.

Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is hireEZ minus Recruitee, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.

CategoryWeighthireEZRecruiteeΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3842-4-0.8
Bias Audit Transparency18%3030--
FRIA Support15%2527-2-0.3
Data Governance Disclosure15%6052+8+1.2
Human Oversight Design12%5858--
Post-Market Monitoring12%3840-2-0.2
Customer Documentation8%5858--
Total100%42F42F--0.1

Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeighthireEZRecruitee
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%11Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%11—11—
FRIA Support15%01—11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%20Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%20Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%95Sources on the vendor's own domain147Sources on the vendor's own domain

hireEZ has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Recruitee has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 14 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 35 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 14 for hireEZ, across 1 distinct source domain, and 21 for Recruitee, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
hireEZ last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Recruitee last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.

Where next