§ The result
HiringBranch leads HireLogic on all 7 criteria.
HiringBranch finishes 18 points clear of HireLogic under rubric v1.0 — 52 against 34 — across the Assessment and Video interview cohorts. HiringBranch leads every one of the 7 criteria, HireLogic none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Human Oversight Design, HireLogic 48 to HiringBranch 52. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (HireLogic 15, HiringBranch 60) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 45% of the weighted advantage HiringBranch holds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
HireLogic
HireLogic joins phone, video and in-person interviews to transcribe them and generate AI notes, job-description coverage, candidate insights and flags for potentially discriminatory interviewer questions, and also offers an asynchronous AI interview agent that scores candidates on relevance and depth of knowledge.
Vendor profile
HiringBranch
HiringBranch is an AI skills-assessment platform that measures 50+ communication and soft skills from candidates' open-ended, conversational job-simulation responses (text and voice) to screen and rank applicants for customer-facing roles.
§ The record
HireLogic is filed under Video interview AI, HiringBranch under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773, Mobley v. Workday and Colorado AI Act.
| Record | HireLogic | HiringBranch |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | CA |
| Founded | Not recorded | 2014 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 45% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HireLogic 15 · HiringBranch 60
8.1 weighted points to HiringBranch
20% weight · 64% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HireLogic 42 · HiringBranch 60
3.6 weighted points to HiringBranch
8% weight · 73% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HireLogic 45 · HiringBranch 64
1.5 weighted points to HiringBranch
15% weight · 81% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HireLogic 25 · HiringBranch 35
1.5 weighted points to HiringBranch
15% weight · 89% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HireLogic 45 · HiringBranch 55
1.5 weighted points to HiringBranch
12% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HireLogic 28 · HiringBranch 40
1.4 weighted points to HiringBranch
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HireLogic 48 · HiringBranch 52
0.5 weighted points to HiringBranch
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -18.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 18.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -18 beside that -18.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HireLogic minus HiringBranch.
| Category | Weight | HireLogic | HiringBranch | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 42 | 60 | -18 | -3.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 60 | -45 | -8.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 35 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 55 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 52 | -4 | -0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 40 | -12 | -1.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 45 | 64 | -19 | -1.5 |
| Total | 100% | 34 (F) | 52 (F) | -18 | -18.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HireLogic | HiringBranch | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 23 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 13 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
HireLogic has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; HiringBranch has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 48 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for HireLogic, across 1 distinct source domain, and 19 for HiringBranch, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HireLogic last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HiringBranch last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next