§ The result
iMocha leads HireLogic on all 7 criteria.
iMocha finishes 22 points clear of HireLogic under rubric v1.0 — 56 against 34 — across the Assessment and Video interview cohorts. iMocha leads every one of the 7 criteria and 5 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; HireLogic leads none. Even Bias Audit Transparency, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (HireLogic 15, iMocha 44, 18% weight), is only 24% of the weighted advantage iMocha builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
HireLogic
HireLogic joins phone, video and in-person interviews to transcribe them and generate AI notes, job-description coverage, candidate insights and flags for potentially discriminatory interviewer questions, and also offers an asynchronous AI interview agent that scores candidates on relevance and depth of knowledge.
Vendor profile
iMocha
iMocha is an AI-powered skills assessment and skills-intelligence platform that evaluates candidates and employees across technical, cognitive, coding, and soft skills for hiring and internal talent management, including AI-based coding simulators and an AI video interviewer (Tara).
§ The record
HireLogic is filed under Video interview AI, iMocha under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773, Mobley v. Workday and Colorado AI Act.
| Record | HireLogic | iMocha |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | IN |
| Founded | Not recorded | 2015 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 24% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HireLogic 15 · iMocha 44
5.2 weighted points to iMocha
20% weight · 48% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HireLogic 42 · iMocha 68
5.2 weighted points to iMocha
15% weight · 63% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HireLogic 45 · iMocha 66
3.1 weighted points to iMocha
12% weight · 74% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HireLogic 28 · iMocha 48
2.4 weighted points to iMocha
15% weight · 83% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HireLogic 25 · iMocha 38
1.9 weighted points to iMocha
12% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HireLogic 48 · iMocha 64
1.9 weighted points to iMocha
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HireLogic 45 · iMocha 66
1.7 weighted points to iMocha
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -21.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 21.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -22 beside that -21.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HireLogic minus iMocha.
| Category | Weight | HireLogic | iMocha | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 42 | 68 | -26 | -5.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 44 | -29 | -5.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 38 | -13 | -1.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 66 | -21 | -3.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 64 | -16 | -1.9 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 48 | -20 | -2.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 45 | 66 | -21 | -1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 34 (F) | 56 (F) | -22 | -21.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HireLogic | iMocha | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 23 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 21 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
HireLogic has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; iMocha has 26 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for iMocha sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 55 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for HireLogic, across 1 distinct source domain, and 26 for iMocha, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HireLogic last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- iMocha last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next