§ The result
HireLogic leads JobDiva by 5 points.
HireLogic scores 34 and JobDiva 29 under rubric v1.0, a 5-point gap across the Video interview and ATS-integrated cohorts. The 7 criteria split 5 to 1 in favour of HireLogic, with 1 level: HireLogic is ahead on Article 11 Technical Documentation and JobDiva on Post-Market Monitoring. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (HireLogic 42, JobDiva 28) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 51% of the weighted advantage HireLogic holds across the 5 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
HireLogic
HireLogic joins phone, video and in-person interviews to transcribe them and generate AI notes, job-description coverage, candidate insights and flags for potentially discriminatory interviewer questions, and also offers an asynchronous AI interview agent that scores candidates on relevance and depth of knowledge.
Vendor profile
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
§ The record
HireLogic is filed under Video interview AI, JobDiva under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only HireLogic is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HireLogic | JobDiva |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | Not recorded | 2003 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 49% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HireLogic 42 · JobDiva 28
2.8 weighted points to HireLogic
15% weight · 67% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HireLogic 45 · JobDiva 38
1.1 weighted points to HireLogic
12% weight · 84% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HireLogic 48 · JobDiva 40
1.0 weighted points to HireLogic
15% weight · 92% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HireLogic 25 · JobDiva 22
0.4 weighted points to HireLogic
12% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HireLogic 28 · JobDiva 30
0.2 weighted points to JobDiva
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HireLogic 45 · JobDiva 42
0.2 weighted points to HireLogic
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +5.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +5 beside that +5.3.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HireLogic minus JobDiva.
| Category | Weight | HireLogic | JobDiva | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 42 | 28 | +14 | +2.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 15 | - | - |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 22 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 38 | +7 | +1.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 40 | +8 | +1.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 30 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 45 | 42 | +3 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 34 (F) | 29 (F) | +5 | +5.3 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HireLogic | JobDiva | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 2 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 23 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HireLogic has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 57 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for HireLogic, across 1 distinct source domain, and 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HireLogic last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next