§ The result
Jobma leads HireLogic on all 7 criteria.
Jobma finishes 15 points clear of HireLogic inside the Video interview cohort under rubric v1.0: 49 against 34. Jobma takes all 7 criteria and HireLogic none of them; the nearest contest is FRIA Support, HireLogic 25 to Jobma 35. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (HireLogic 15, Jobma 40, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 30% of the weighted advantage Jobma holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
HireLogic
HireLogic joins phone, video and in-person interviews to transcribe them and generate AI notes, job-description coverage, candidate insights and flags for potentially discriminatory interviewer questions, and also offers an asynchronous AI interview agent that scores candidates on relevance and depth of knowledge.
Vendor profile
Jobma
AI video interviewing platform offering one-way (pre-recorded), live, and agentic AI interviews with automated transcription and AI scoring of candidate video, audio, and written responses as recruiter decision-support.
§ The record
HireLogic and Jobma are both filed under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773, Mobley v. Workday and Colorado AI Act.
| Record | HireLogic | Jobma |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | Not recorded | 2012 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 30% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HireLogic 15 · Jobma 40
4.5 weighted points to Jobma
20% weight · 47% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HireLogic 42 · Jobma 55
2.6 weighted points to Jobma
12% weight · 60% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HireLogic 28 · Jobma 44
1.9 weighted points to Jobma
15% weight · 71% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HireLogic 45 · Jobma 56
1.6 weighted points to Jobma
15% weight · 81% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HireLogic 25 · Jobma 35
1.5 weighted points to Jobma
12% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HireLogic 48 · Jobma 60
1.4 weighted points to Jobma
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HireLogic 45 · Jobma 62
1.4 weighted points to Jobma
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -15.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 15.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -15 beside that -15.0.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HireLogic minus Jobma.
| Category | Weight | HireLogic | Jobma | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 42 | 55 | -13 | -2.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 40 | -25 | -4.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 35 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 56 | -11 | -1.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 60 | -12 | -1.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 44 | -16 | -1.9 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 45 | 62 | -17 | -1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 34 (F) | 49 (F) | -15 | -15.0 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HireLogic | Jobma | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 23 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 17 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HireLogic has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Jobma has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 17 with a source URL, 4 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 50 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for HireLogic, across 1 distinct source domain, and 21 for Jobma, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HireLogic last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Jobma last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next