§ The result
LinkedIn Recruiter leads HireLogic on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, LinkedIn Recruiter (Sourcing) opens a 23-point lead on HireLogic (Video interview), 57 to 34. HireLogic leads none of the 7 criteria, and LinkedIn Recruiter is ahead on 4 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them. Even Bias Audit Transparency, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (HireLogic 15, LinkedIn Recruiter 50, 18% weight), is only 28% of the weighted advantage LinkedIn Recruiter builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
HireLogic
HireLogic joins phone, video and in-person interviews to transcribe them and generate AI notes, job-description coverage, candidate insights and flags for potentially discriminatory interviewer questions, and also offers an asynchronous AI interview agent that scores candidates on relevance and depth of knowledge.
Vendor profile
LinkedIn Recruiter
LinkedIn Recruiter is LinkedIn's enterprise sourcing and candidate-management platform, whose Hiring Assistant add-on and AI-Assisted Search use AI to turn intake notes into qualifications, source and rank candidates, evaluate applicants against recruiter-set qualifications, and draft or send outreach.
§ The record
HireLogic is filed under Video interview AI, LinkedIn Recruiter under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only HireLogic is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HireLogic | LinkedIn Recruiter |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | Not recorded | 2002 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 28% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HireLogic 15 · LinkedIn Recruiter 50
6.3 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter
20% weight · 50% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HireLogic 42 · LinkedIn Recruiter 67
5.0 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter
12% weight · 62% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HireLogic 28 · LinkedIn Recruiter 50
2.6 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter
15% weight · 73% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HireLogic 45 · LinkedIn Recruiter 62
2.5 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter
12% weight · 83% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HireLogic 48 · LinkedIn Recruiter 66
2.2 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter
15% weight · 92% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HireLogic 25 · LinkedIn Recruiter 38
1.9 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HireLogic 45 · LinkedIn Recruiter 68
1.8 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -22.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 22.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -23 beside that -22.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HireLogic minus LinkedIn Recruiter.
| Category | Weight | HireLogic | LinkedIn Recruiter | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 42 | 67 | -25 | -5.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 50 | -35 | -6.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 38 | -13 | -1.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 62 | -17 | -2.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 66 | -18 | -2.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 50 | -22 | -2.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 45 | 68 | -23 | -1.8 |
| Total | 100% | 34 (F) | 57 (F) | -23 | -22.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HireLogic | LinkedIn Recruiter | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 23 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 34 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
HireLogic has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; LinkedIn Recruiter has 39 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for LinkedIn Recruiter sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 68 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for HireLogic, across 1 distinct source domain, and 39 for LinkedIn Recruiter, across 6 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HireLogic last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- LinkedIn Recruiter last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next