§ The result
HireLogic leads Mercor on all 7 criteria.
HireLogic, filed under Video interview, comes out 11 points above Mercor, filed under Screening: 34 against 23 under rubric v1.0. HireLogic leads every one of the 7 criteria, Mercor none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Bias Audit Transparency, HireLogic 15 to Mercor 10. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Data Governance Disclosure (HireLogic 45, Mercor 22) and Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (HireLogic 42, Mercor 22), the second being 36% of the weighted advantage HireLogic holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
HireLogic
HireLogic joins phone, video and in-person interviews to transcribe them and generate AI notes, job-description coverage, candidate insights and flags for potentially discriminatory interviewer questions, and also offers an asynchronous AI interview agent that scores candidates on relevance and depth of knowledge.
Vendor profile
Mercor
Mercor is an AI talent platform that runs automated 20-minute AI video interviews and semantic resume/profile matching to vet, score, and place candidates and expert contractors, and offers an enterprise applicant-screening product that scores employers' applicant pools against role rubrics with pass/fail recommendations.
§ The record
HireLogic is filed under Video interview AI, Mercor under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773, Mobley v. Workday and Colorado AI Act.
| Record | HireLogic | Mercor |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | Not recorded | 2023 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 36% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HireLogic 42 · Mercor 22
4.0 weighted points to HireLogic
15% weight · 67% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HireLogic 45 · Mercor 22
3.4 weighted points to HireLogic
12% weight · 75% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HireLogic 28 · Mercor 20
1.0 weighted points to HireLogic
18% weight · 83% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HireLogic 15 · Mercor 10
0.9 weighted points to HireLogic
15% weight · 90% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HireLogic 25 · Mercor 20
0.8 weighted points to HireLogic
12% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HireLogic 48 · Mercor 42
0.7 weighted points to HireLogic
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HireLogic 45 · Mercor 40
0.4 weighted points to HireLogic
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +11.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +11 beside that +11.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HireLogic minus Mercor.
| Category | Weight | HireLogic | Mercor | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 42 | 22 | +20 | +4.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 10 | +5 | +0.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 20 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 22 | +23 | +3.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 42 | +6 | +0.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 20 | +8 | +1.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 45 | 40 | +5 | +0.4 |
| Total | 100% | 34 (F) | 23 (F) | +11 | +11.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HireLogic | Mercor | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 2 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 23 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 10 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HireLogic has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Mercor has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 8 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 45 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for HireLogic, across 1 distinct source domain, and 16 for Mercor, across 4 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HireLogic last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Mercor last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next