§ The result
PageUp leads HireLogic on all 7 criteria.
PageUp (ATS-integrated) and HireLogic (Video interview) are 30 points apart under rubric v1.0, 64 (D) for PageUp against 34 (F) for HireLogic. HireLogic leads none of the 7 criteria, and PageUp is ahead on 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (HireLogic 15, PageUp 80, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 39% of the weighted advantage PageUp holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
HireLogic
HireLogic joins phone, video and in-person interviews to transcribe them and generate AI notes, job-description coverage, candidate insights and flags for potentially discriminatory interviewer questions, and also offers an asynchronous AI interview agent that scores candidates on relevance and depth of knowledge.
Vendor profile
PageUp
PageUp is an enterprise talent acquisition suite (ATS, recruitment marketing/CRM, onboarding, learning and performance). Its AI Skills Matching sorts each applicant's resume against skills taken from the job ad into five bands, from Excellent Match to Not a Match, and recruiters reach those results through Paige, its conversational assistant.
§ The record
HireLogic is filed under Video interview AI, PageUp under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only HireLogic is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HireLogic | PageUp |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | AU |
| Founded | Not recorded | 1997 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 39% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HireLogic 15 · PageUp 80
11.7 weighted points to PageUp
20% weight · 61% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HireLogic 42 · PageUp 74
6.4 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 72% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HireLogic 28 · PageUp 55
3.2 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 81% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HireLogic 45 · PageUp 63
2.7 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 89% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HireLogic 25 · PageUp 40
2.3 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HireLogic 48 · PageUp 64
1.9 weighted points to PageUp
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HireLogic 45 · PageUp 63
1.4 weighted points to PageUp
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -29.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 29.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -30 beside that -29.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HireLogic minus PageUp.
| Category | Weight | HireLogic | PageUp | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 42 | 74 | -32 | -6.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 80 | -65 | -11.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 40 | -15 | -2.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 63 | -18 | -2.7 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 64 | -16 | -1.9 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 55 | -27 | -3.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 45 | 63 | -18 | -1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 34 (F) | 64 (D) | -30 | -29.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HireLogic | PageUp | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 23 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 24 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
HireLogic has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; PageUp has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for PageUp sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 57 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for HireLogic, across 1 distinct source domain, and 28 for PageUp, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HireLogic last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- PageUp last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next