§ The result
Plum leads HireLogic on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, Plum (Assessment) opens a 20-point lead on HireLogic (Video interview), 54 to 34. Plum leads every one of the 7 criteria, HireLogic none of them, and the closest of the 7 is FRIA Support, HireLogic 25 to Plum 28. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — HireLogic 15, Plum 83 — and at an 18% weight it carries 61% of the weighted advantage Plum holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
HireLogic
HireLogic joins phone, video and in-person interviews to transcribe them and generate AI notes, job-description coverage, candidate insights and flags for potentially discriminatory interviewer questions, and also offers an asynchronous AI interview agent that scores candidates on relevance and depth of knowledge.
Vendor profile
Plum
Plum is a pre-employment talent assessment platform that uses a Five-Factor (Big Five) psychometric Discovery Survey and a Talent Match model to score and rank candidates on behavioral "durable skills" for role fit, hiring, and development.
§ The record
HireLogic is filed under Video interview AI, Plum under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773, Mobley v. Workday and Colorado AI Act.
| Record | HireLogic | Plum |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | CA |
| Founded | Not recorded | 2012 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 61% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HireLogic 15 · Plum 83
12.2 weighted points to Plum
20% weight · 77% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HireLogic 42 · Plum 58
3.2 weighted points to Plum
8% weight · 84% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HireLogic 45 · Plum 63
1.4 weighted points to Plum
15% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HireLogic 45 · Plum 54
1.3 weighted points to Plum
12% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HireLogic 28 · Plum 36
1.0 weighted points to Plum
12% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HireLogic 48 · Plum 52
0.5 weighted points to Plum
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HireLogic 25 · Plum 28
0.4 weighted points to Plum
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -20.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 20.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -20 beside that -20.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HireLogic minus Plum.
| Category | Weight | HireLogic | Plum | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 42 | 58 | -16 | -3.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 83 | -68 | -12.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 28 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 54 | -9 | -1.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 52 | -4 | -0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 36 | -8 | -1.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 45 | 63 | -18 | -1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 34 (F) | 54 (F) | -20 | -20.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HireLogic | Plum | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 23 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 15 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
HireLogic has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Plum has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 4 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 48 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for HireLogic, across 1 distinct source domain, and 19 for Plum, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HireLogic last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Plum last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next