§ The result
Retorio leads HireLogic on all 7 criteria.
Retorio, filed under Assessment, comes out 10 points above HireLogic, filed under Video interview: 44 against 34 under rubric v1.0. Retorio leads every one of the 7 criteria, HireLogic none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Human Oversight Design, HireLogic 48 to Retorio 52. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — HireLogic 15, Retorio 40 — and at an 18% weight it carries 48% of the weighted advantage Retorio holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
HireLogic
HireLogic joins phone, video and in-person interviews to transcribe them and generate AI notes, job-description coverage, candidate insights and flags for potentially discriminatory interviewer questions, and also offers an asynchronous AI interview agent that scores candidates on relevance and depth of knowledge.
Vendor profile
Retorio
Video-based AI that analyses words, voice, and facial expression/body language to infer Big Five (OCEAN) personality and behavioural traits.
§ The record
HireLogic is filed under Video interview AI, Retorio under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773, Mobley v. Workday and Colorado AI Act.
| Record | HireLogic | Retorio |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | DE |
| Founded | Not recorded | 2018 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 48% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HireLogic 15 · Retorio 40
4.5 weighted points to Retorio
20% weight · 65% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HireLogic 42 · Retorio 50
1.6 weighted points to Retorio
15% weight · 76% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HireLogic 45 · Retorio 52
1.1 weighted points to Retorio
15% weight · 84% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HireLogic 25 · Retorio 30
0.8 weighted points to Retorio
12% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HireLogic 28 · Retorio 33
0.6 weighted points to Retorio
12% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HireLogic 48 · Retorio 52
0.5 weighted points to Retorio
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HireLogic 45 · Retorio 50
0.4 weighted points to Retorio
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -9.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -10 beside that -9.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HireLogic minus Retorio.
| Category | Weight | HireLogic | Retorio | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 42 | 50 | -8 | -1.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 40 | -25 | -4.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 30 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 52 | -7 | -1.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 52 | -4 | -0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 33 | -5 | -0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 45 | 50 | -5 | -0.4 |
| Total | 100% | 34 (F) | 44 (F) | -10 | -9.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HireLogic | Retorio | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 23 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 16 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
HireLogic has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Retorio has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Retorio sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 51 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for HireLogic, across 1 distinct source domain, and 22 for Retorio, across 4 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HireLogic last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Retorio last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next