HomeCompareHireLogic vs SeekOut

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

HireLogic vs SeekOut

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

HireLogic and SeekOut tie at 34.

HireLogic, filed under Video interview, and SeekOut, filed under Sourcing, tie at 34 under rubric v1.0 by different routes through the criteria. HireLogic leads 5 of the 7 criteria and SeekOut 1, with 1 level, yet the two totals land on the same number. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — HireLogic 15, SeekOut 40 — and at an 18% weight it carries 100% of the weighted advantage SeekOut holds across the 1 criterion on that side of the table.

§ The record

HireLogic is filed under Video interview AI, SeekOut under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only HireLogic is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordHireLogicSeekOut
Price tierLowEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
FoundedNot recorded2017

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 50% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    HireLogic 15 · SeekOut 40

    4.5 weighted points to SeekOut

  2. 15% weight · 67% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    HireLogic 45 · SeekOut 35

    1.5 weighted points to HireLogic

  3. 20% weight · 83% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    HireLogic 42 · SeekOut 35

    1.4 weighted points to HireLogic

  4. 8% weight · 92% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    HireLogic 45 · SeekOut 35

    0.8 weighted points to HireLogic

  5. 12% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    HireLogic 48 · SeekOut 45

    0.4 weighted points to HireLogic

  6. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    HireLogic 28 · SeekOut 25

    0.4 weighted points to HireLogic

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -0.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that -0.1.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is HireLogic minus SeekOut.

CategoryWeightHireLogicSeekOutΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4235+7+1.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%1540-25-4.5
FRIA Support15%2525--
Data Governance Disclosure15%4535+10+1.5
Human Oversight Design12%4845+3+0.4
Post-Market Monitoring12%2825+3+0.4
Customer Documentation8%4535+10+0.8
Total100%34 (F)34 (F)--0.1

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightHireLogicSeekOut
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31—11—
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain01—
Data Governance Disclosure15%41Sources on the vendor's own domain10Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%50Sources on the vendor's own domain10Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain01—
Customer Documentation8%41Sources on the vendor's own domain10Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%236Sources on the vendor's own domain54Sources on the vendor's own domain

HireLogic has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; SeekOut has 9 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 5 with a source URL, 4 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 38 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for HireLogic, across 1 distinct source domain, and 9 for SeekOut, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
HireLogic last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
SeekOut last reviewed
May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.