§ The result
SHL leads HireLogic on all 7 criteria.
SHL finishes 17 points clear of HireLogic under rubric v1.0 — 51 against 34 — across the Assessment and Video interview cohorts. SHL leads every one of the 7 criteria, HireLogic none of them, and the closest of the 7 is FRIA Support, HireLogic 25 to SHL 30. The advantage SHL holds is spread out: Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (HireLogic 15, SHL 50, 18% weight), yet it supplies only 38% of the weighted points SHL gains across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
HireLogic
HireLogic joins phone, video and in-person interviews to transcribe them and generate AI notes, job-description coverage, candidate insights and flags for potentially discriminatory interviewer questions, and also offers an asynchronous AI interview agent that scores candidates on relevance and depth of knowledge.
Vendor profile
SHL
SHL is a global talent-assessment provider offering AI-scored cognitive ability, personality, behavioral, situational-judgement, coding, and video-interview assessments that score, rank, and recommend candidates for hiring and development decisions.
§ The record
HireLogic is filed under Video interview AI, SHL under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773, Mobley v. Workday and Colorado AI Act.
| Record | HireLogic | SHL |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | GB |
| Founded | Not recorded | 1977 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 38% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HireLogic 15 · SHL 50
6.3 weighted points to SHL
20% weight · 60% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HireLogic 42 · SHL 60
3.6 weighted points to SHL
15% weight · 72% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HireLogic 45 · SHL 58
1.9 weighted points to SHL
12% weight · 81% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HireLogic 28 · SHL 40
1.4 weighted points to SHL
12% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HireLogic 48 · SHL 58
1.2 weighted points to SHL
8% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HireLogic 45 · SHL 60
1.2 weighted points to SHL
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HireLogic 25 · SHL 30
0.8 weighted points to SHL
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -16.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 16.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -17 beside that -16.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HireLogic minus SHL.
| Category | Weight | HireLogic | SHL | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 42 | 60 | -18 | -3.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 50 | -35 | -6.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 30 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 58 | -13 | -1.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 58 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 40 | -12 | -1.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 45 | 60 | -15 | -1.2 |
| Total | 100% | 34 (F) | 51 (F) | -17 | -16.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HireLogic | SHL | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 23 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 15 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HireLogic has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; SHL has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 4 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 48 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for HireLogic, across 1 distinct source domain, and 19 for SHL, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HireLogic last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- SHL last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next