HomeCompareHireLogic vs Talview

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

HireLogic vs Talview

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Talview leads HireLogic on 6 of the 7 criteria.

Talview scores 42 and HireLogic 34 under rubric v1.0 — an 8-point gap inside the Video interview cohort. HireLogic is ahead on none of the 7 criteria: Talview takes 6, the remaining criterion is level, and the nearest of those 6 is Data Governance Disclosure, HireLogic 45 to Talview 48. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — HireLogic 15, Talview 38 — and at an 18% weight it carries 51% of the weighted advantage Talview holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

HireLogic and Talview are both filed under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773, Mobley v. Workday and Colorado AI Act.

RecordHireLogicTalview
Price tierLowEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
FoundedNot recorded2012

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 51% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    HireLogic 15 · Talview 38

    4.1 weighted points to Talview

  2. 20% weight · 71% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    HireLogic 42 · Talview 50

    1.6 weighted points to Talview

  3. 12% weight · 82% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    HireLogic 48 · Talview 55

    0.8 weighted points to Talview

  4. 8% weight · 88% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    HireLogic 45 · Talview 52

    0.6 weighted points to Talview

  5. 12% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    HireLogic 28 · Talview 32

    0.5 weighted points to Talview

  6. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    HireLogic 45 · Talview 48

    0.4 weighted points to Talview

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -8.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -8 beside that -8.1.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is HireLogic minus Talview.

CategoryWeightHireLogicTalviewΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4250-8-1.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%1538-23-4.1
FRIA Support15%2525--
Data Governance Disclosure15%4548-3-0.4
Human Oversight Design12%4855-7-0.8
Post-Market Monitoring12%2832-4-0.5
Customer Documentation8%4552-7-0.6
Total100%34 (F)42 (F)-8-8.1

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightHireLogicTalview
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31—11—
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain01—
Data Governance Disclosure15%41Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%50Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%41Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%236Sources on the vendor's own domain116Sources on the vendor's own domain

HireLogic has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Talview has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 46 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for HireLogic, across 1 distinct source domain, and 17 for Talview, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
HireLogic last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Talview last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.