§ The result
Teamtailor leads HireLogic on all 7 criteria.
Teamtailor, filed under ATS-integrated, comes out 13 points above HireLogic, filed under Video interview: 47 against 34 under rubric v1.0. Teamtailor takes all 7 criteria from HireLogic without a 20-point raw gap on any of them; the closest is Human Oversight Design, HireLogic 48 to Teamtailor 54. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: FRIA Support (HireLogic 25, Teamtailor 42) and Bias Audit Transparency at 18% (HireLogic 15, Teamtailor 30), the second being 21% of the weighted advantage Teamtailor holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
HireLogic
HireLogic joins phone, video and in-person interviews to transcribe them and generate AI notes, job-description coverage, candidate insights and flags for potentially discriminatory interviewer questions, and also offers an asynchronous AI interview agent that scores candidates on relevance and depth of knowledge.
Vendor profile
Teamtailor
Teamtailor is a Stockholm-based applicant tracking and employer-branding platform whose OpenAI-powered "Co-pilot" assists recruiters with candidate screening, resume and interview summaries, talent-pool matching, interview-question generation, and AI-assisted job-ad and content writing.
§ The record
HireLogic is filed under Video interview AI, Teamtailor under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only HireLogic is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HireLogic | Teamtailor |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | SE |
| Founded | Not recorded | 2013 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 21% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HireLogic 15 · Teamtailor 30
2.7 weighted points to Teamtailor
15% weight · 42% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HireLogic 25 · Teamtailor 42
2.5 weighted points to Teamtailor
15% weight · 57% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HireLogic 45 · Teamtailor 58
1.9 weighted points to Teamtailor
12% weight · 71% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HireLogic 28 · Teamtailor 42
1.7 weighted points to Teamtailor
20% weight · 83% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HireLogic 42 · Teamtailor 50
1.6 weighted points to Teamtailor
8% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HireLogic 45 · Teamtailor 62
1.4 weighted points to Teamtailor
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HireLogic 48 · Teamtailor 54
0.7 weighted points to Teamtailor
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -12.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 12.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -13 beside that -12.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HireLogic minus Teamtailor.
| Category | Weight | HireLogic | Teamtailor | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 42 | 50 | -8 | -1.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 30 | -15 | -2.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 42 | -17 | -2.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 58 | -13 | -1.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 54 | -6 | -0.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 42 | -14 | -1.7 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 45 | 62 | -17 | -1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 34 (F) | 47 (F) | -13 | -12.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HireLogic | Teamtailor | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 23 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 14 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
HireLogic has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Teamtailor has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 14 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 49 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for HireLogic, across 1 distinct source domain, and 20 for Teamtailor, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HireLogic last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Teamtailor last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next