§ The result
TestGorilla leads HireLogic on all 7 criteria.
TestGorilla, filed under Assessment, comes out 13 points above HireLogic, filed under Video interview: 47 against 34 under rubric v1.0. Of the 7 criteria HireLogic wins none, and the narrowest lead TestGorilla holds is on FRIA Support, HireLogic 25 to TestGorilla 30. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (HireLogic 15, TestGorilla 38, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 34% of the weighted advantage TestGorilla holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
HireLogic
HireLogic joins phone, video and in-person interviews to transcribe them and generate AI notes, job-description coverage, candidate insights and flags for potentially discriminatory interviewer questions, and also offers an asynchronous AI interview agent that scores candidates on relevance and depth of knowledge.
Vendor profile
TestGorilla
TestGorilla is a pre-employment skills-assessment platform offering a large test library plus AI features for resume scoring, candidate sourcing, and one-way/conversational AI video interviews to support skills-based hiring.
§ The record
HireLogic is filed under Video interview AI, TestGorilla under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773, Mobley v. Workday and Colorado AI Act.
| Record | HireLogic | TestGorilla |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | NL |
| Founded | Not recorded | 2019 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 34% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HireLogic 15 · TestGorilla 38
4.1 weighted points to TestGorilla
20% weight · 50% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HireLogic 42 · TestGorilla 52
2.0 weighted points to TestGorilla
15% weight · 64% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HireLogic 45 · TestGorilla 56
1.6 weighted points to TestGorilla
12% weight · 76% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HireLogic 48 · TestGorilla 60
1.4 weighted points to TestGorilla
12% weight · 85% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HireLogic 28 · TestGorilla 38
1.2 weighted points to TestGorilla
8% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HireLogic 45 · TestGorilla 58
1.0 weighted points to TestGorilla
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HireLogic 25 · TestGorilla 30
0.8 weighted points to TestGorilla
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -12.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 12.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -13 beside that -12.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HireLogic minus TestGorilla.
| Category | Weight | HireLogic | TestGorilla | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 42 | 52 | -10 | -2.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 38 | -23 | -4.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 30 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 56 | -11 | -1.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 60 | -12 | -1.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 38 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 45 | 58 | -13 | -1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 34 (F) | 47 (F) | -13 | -12.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HireLogic | TestGorilla | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 23 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 14 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
HireLogic has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; TestGorilla has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 14 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for TestGorilla sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 48 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for HireLogic, across 1 distinct source domain, and 19 for TestGorilla, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HireLogic last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- TestGorilla last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next