§ The result
Tribepad leads HireLogic on all 7 criteria.
Tribepad finishes 22 points clear of HireLogic under rubric v1.0 — 56 against 34 — across the ATS-integrated and Video interview cohorts. Tribepad leads every one of the 7 criteria, HireLogic none of them, and the closest of the 7 is FRIA Support, HireLogic 25 to Tribepad 30. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (HireLogic 15, Tribepad 78) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 52% of the weighted advantage Tribepad holds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
HireLogic
HireLogic joins phone, video and in-person interviews to transcribe them and generate AI notes, job-description coverage, candidate insights and flags for potentially discriminatory interviewer questions, and also offers an asynchronous AI interview agent that scores candidates on relevance and depth of knowledge.
Vendor profile
Tribepad
Tribepad is a UK applicant tracking system whose built-in Sidekick AI assistant scores and ranks applicants against recruiter-weighted skills and generates candidate summaries, SWOT analyses, job descriptions, salary suggestions and interview questions.
§ The record
HireLogic is filed under Video interview AI, Tribepad under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only HireLogic is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HireLogic | Tribepad |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | GB |
| Founded | Not recorded | 2008 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 52% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HireLogic 15 · Tribepad 78
11.3 weighted points to Tribepad
12% weight · 66% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HireLogic 28 · Tribepad 54
3.1 weighted points to Tribepad
20% weight · 79% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HireLogic 42 · Tribepad 56
2.8 weighted points to Tribepad
15% weight · 86% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HireLogic 45 · Tribepad 56
1.6 weighted points to Tribepad
12% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HireLogic 48 · Tribepad 58
1.2 weighted points to Tribepad
8% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HireLogic 45 · Tribepad 58
1.0 weighted points to Tribepad
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HireLogic 25 · Tribepad 30
0.8 weighted points to Tribepad
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -21.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 21.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -22 beside that -21.9.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HireLogic minus Tribepad.
| Category | Weight | HireLogic | Tribepad | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 42 | 56 | -14 | -2.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 78 | -63 | -11.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 30 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 56 | -11 | -1.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 58 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 54 | -26 | -3.1 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 45 | 58 | -13 | -1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 34 (F) | 56 (F) | -22 | -21.9 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HireLogic | Tribepad | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 23 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 28 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
HireLogic has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Tribepad has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Tribepad sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 61 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for HireLogic, across 1 distinct source domain, and 32 for Tribepad, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HireLogic last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Tribepad last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next