HomeCompareHirePro vs Pulsifi

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

HirePro vs Pulsifi

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

HirePro leads Pulsifi on 4 of the 7 criteria.

HirePro scores 38 and Pulsifi 33 under rubric v1.0, a 5-point gap across the Screening and Assessment cohorts. HirePro leads 4 of the 7 criteria and the remaining 3 are level, so Pulsifi is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 4 HirePro leads is Customer Documentation, HirePro 52 to Pulsifi 46. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (HirePro 33, Pulsifi 20) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 45% of the weighted advantage HirePro holds across the 4 criteria it leads.

§ The record

HirePro is filed under Screening AI, Pulsifi under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Video interview.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordHireProPulsifi
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersINSG
Founded20042017

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 45% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    HirePro 33 · Pulsifi 20

    2.3 weighted points to HirePro

  2. 15% weight · 74% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    HirePro 50 · Pulsifi 40

    1.5 weighted points to HirePro

  3. 12% weight · 91% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    HirePro 35 · Pulsifi 28

    0.8 weighted points to HirePro

  4. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    HirePro 52 · Pulsifi 46

    0.5 weighted points to HirePro

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 4 figures above sum to +5.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +5 beside that +5.2.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is HirePro minus Pulsifi.

CategoryWeightHireProPulsifiΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3030--
Bias Audit Transparency18%3320+13+2.3
FRIA Support15%2525--
Data Governance Disclosure15%5040+10+1.5
Human Oversight Design12%5555--
Post-Market Monitoring12%3528+7+0.8
Customer Documentation8%5246+6+0.5
Total100%38 (F)33 (F)+5+5.2

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightHireProPulsifi
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%21—31—
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain32Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%41Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%216Sources on the vendor's own domain267Sources on the vendor's own domain

HirePro has 27 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Pulsifi has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 60 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 27 for HirePro, across 1 distinct source domain, and 33 for Pulsifi, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
HirePro last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Pulsifi last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.