Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
HireQuotient vs Qureos
HireQuotient
EasySource by HireQuotient is an AI recruiting platform for North American frontline employers that sources and scores candidates from LinkedIn, the open web and partner databases, verifies licences, automates outreach including AI voice calls, and adds an ATS, interview scheduling, and skills, cognitive and AI-scored video assessments.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
Qureos
Qureos is a Dubai-based AI recruiting platform whose Iris agents source candidates, score and rank applicants against recruiter-set criteria, and run AI voice and video interviews with personality scoring, alongside an ATS and a job-seeker marketplace focused on MENA and South Asia.
Substantial gaps
Screening
The result
HireQuotient takes the total, Qureos takes more of the criteria.
HireQuotient holds a 1-point edge over Qureos under rubric v1.0, 34 to 33, across the Sourcing and Screening cohorts. Qureos leads more of the criteria, 4 against 3 for HireQuotient, yet HireQuotient takes Article 11 Technical Documentation, which carries 20% of the rubric, and the weighted sum with it. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — HireQuotient 35, Qureos 28 — and at a 20% weight it carries 49% of the weighted advantage HireQuotient holds across the 3 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- HireQuotient3
- Qureos4
- Widest raw gap
- Article 11 Technical Documentation35 vs 28
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Article 11 Technical Documentation20% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
HireQuotient is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Qureos under Screening AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Video interview.
Both are in scope of
| Record | HireQuotient | Qureos |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | SG | AE |
| Founded | 2021 | 2021 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight30% of the movement so far
HireQuotient35Qureos281.4 weighted points to HireQuotient
- 2
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight53% of the movement so far
HireQuotient18Qureos121.1 weighted points to HireQuotient
- 3
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight66% of the movement so far
HireQuotient40Qureos440.6 weighted points to Qureos
- 4
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight79% of the movement so far
HireQuotient30Qureos350.6 weighted points to Qureos
- 5
FRIA Support
15% weight89% of the movement so far
HireQuotient22Qureos250.4 weighted points to Qureos
- 6
Human Oversight Design
12% weight97% of the movement so far
HireQuotient57Qureos540.4 weighted points to HireQuotient
- 7
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
HireQuotient50Qureos520.2 weighted points to Qureos
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +1.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +1 beside that +1.0.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HireQuotient minus Qureos, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | HireQuotient | Qureos | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 28 | +7 | +1.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 18 | 12 | +6 | +1.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 25 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 40 | 44 | -4 | -0.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 57 | 54 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 35 | -5 | -0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 50 | 52 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 34F | 33F | +1 | +1.0 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HireQuotient | Qureos | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 24 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 28 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HireQuotient has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Qureos has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 64 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for HireQuotient, across 1 distinct source domain, and 35 for Qureos, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HireQuotient last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Qureos last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.