§ The result
3 points separate TestDome and HireQuotient.
TestDome holds a 3-point edge over HireQuotient under rubric v1.0, 37 to 34, across the Assessment and Sourcing cohorts. TestDome leads 4 of the 7 criteria, including Data Governance Disclosure, while HireQuotient leads 2, including Human Oversight Design, and 1 is level. The advantage TestDome holds is spread out: Data Governance Disclosure is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (HireQuotient 40, TestDome 50, 15% weight), yet it supplies only 36% of the weighted points TestDome gains across the 4 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
HireQuotient
EasySource by HireQuotient is an AI recruiting platform for North American frontline employers that sources and scores candidates from LinkedIn, the open web and partner databases, verifies licences, automates outreach including AI voice calls, and adds an ATS, interview scheduling, and skills, cognitive and AI-scored video assessments.
Vendor profile
TestDome
TestDome sells pay-per-candidate online skills tests for coding, Excel and more than 100 other skills. The tests are scored automatically, and open-ended answers can be scored by AI. AI analysis of webcam and screen proctoring recordings flags possible cheating, and a live code-interview tool is included.
§ The record
HireQuotient is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, TestDome under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HireQuotient | TestDome |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Low |
| Headquarters | SG | HR |
| Founded | 2021 | 2013 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
15% weight · 28% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HireQuotient 40 · TestDome 50
1.5 weighted points to TestDome
20% weight · 47% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HireQuotient 35 · TestDome 40
1.0 weighted points to TestDome
15% weight · 64% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HireQuotient 22 · TestDome 28
0.9 weighted points to TestDome
8% weight · 79% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HireQuotient 50 · TestDome 60
0.8 weighted points to TestDome
12% weight · 90% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HireQuotient 57 · TestDome 52
0.6 weighted points to HireQuotient
18% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HireQuotient 18 · TestDome 15
0.5 weighted points to HireQuotient
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -3.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -3 beside that -3.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HireQuotient minus TestDome.
| Category | Weight | HireQuotient | TestDome | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 40 | -5 | -1.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 18 | 15 | +3 | +0.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 28 | -6 | -0.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 40 | 50 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 57 | 52 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 30 | - | - |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 50 | 60 | -10 | -0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 34 (F) | 37 (F) | -3 | -3.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HireQuotient | TestDome | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 24 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 27 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HireQuotient has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; TestDome has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 60 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for HireQuotient, across 1 distinct source domain, and 31 for TestDome, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HireQuotient last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- TestDome last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next