§ The result
Willo leads HireQuotient on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, Willo, filed under Video interview, finishes on 41 and HireQuotient, filed under Sourcing, on 34, 7 points apart. Willo takes all 7 criteria from HireQuotient without a 20-point raw gap on any of them; the closest is Article 11 Technical Documentation, HireQuotient 35 to Willo 38. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Data Governance Disclosure (HireQuotient 40, Willo 53) and Bias Audit Transparency at 18% (HireQuotient 18, Willo 30), the second being 32% of the weighted advantage Willo holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
HireQuotient
EasySource by HireQuotient is an AI recruiting platform for North American frontline employers that sources and scores candidates from LinkedIn, the open web and partner databases, verifies licences, automates outreach including AI voice calls, and adds an ATS, interview scheduling, and skills, cognitive and AI-scored video assessments.
Vendor profile
Willo
Willo is a browser-based asynchronous (one-way) video interview platform that lets employers collect recorded video, audio, multiple-choice and written candidate responses, then uses AI to transcribe, summarize, rank candidates against employer-defined "Blueprint" criteria, and flag scripted or AI-generated answers.
§ The record
HireQuotient is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Willo under Video interview AI. They also share 2 secondary categories: Screening and Assessment.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HireQuotient | Willo |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Low |
| Headquarters | SG | GB |
| Founded | 2021 | 2018 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 32% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HireQuotient 18 · Willo 30
2.2 weighted points to Willo
15% weight · 60% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HireQuotient 40 · Willo 53
1.9 weighted points to Willo
12% weight · 71% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HireQuotient 30 · Willo 36
0.7 weighted points to Willo
20% weight · 80% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HireQuotient 35 · Willo 38
0.6 weighted points to Willo
12% weight · 89% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HireQuotient 57 · Willo 62
0.6 weighted points to Willo
15% weight · 95% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HireQuotient 22 · Willo 25
0.4 weighted points to Willo
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HireQuotient 50 · Willo 54
0.3 weighted points to Willo
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -6.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -7 beside that -6.8.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HireQuotient minus Willo.
| Category | Weight | HireQuotient | Willo | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 38 | -3 | -0.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 18 | 30 | -12 | -2.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 25 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 40 | 53 | -13 | -1.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 57 | 62 | -5 | -0.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 36 | -6 | -0.7 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 50 | 54 | -4 | -0.3 |
| Total | 100% | 34 (F) | 41 (F) | -7 | -6.8 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HireQuotient | Willo | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 24 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 9 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HireQuotient has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Willo has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 43 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for HireQuotient, across 1 distinct source domain, and 14 for Willo, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HireQuotient last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Willo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next