Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
HireQuotient vs Zappyhire
HireQuotient
EasySource by HireQuotient is an AI recruiting platform for North American frontline employers that sources and scores candidates from LinkedIn, the open web and partner databases, verifies licences, automates outreach including AI voice calls, and adds an ATS, interview scheduling, and skills, cognitive and AI-scored video assessments.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
Zappyhire
Zappyhire is an AI-powered recruitment automation platform that screens and ranks candidates through resume parsing, a recruiting chatbot, AI assessments, and robotic video interviews, layered on an applicant tracking system.
Substantial gaps
Screening
The result
HireQuotient and Zappyhire tie at 34.
HireQuotient (Sourcing) and Zappyhire (Screening) tie at 34 under rubric v1.0, arriving there from different criteria. HireQuotient leads 4 of the 7 criteria and Zappyhire 3, yet the two totals land on the same number. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (HireQuotient 18, Zappyhire 28) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 71% of the weighted advantage Zappyhire holds across the 3 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- HireQuotient4
- Zappyhire3
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency18 vs 28
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
HireQuotient is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Zappyhire under Screening AI. They also share 2 secondary categories: ATS-integrated and Video interview.
Both are in scope of
| Record | HireQuotient | Zappyhire |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | SG | IN |
| Founded | 2021 | 2018 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight36% of the movement so far
HireQuotient18Zappyhire281.8 weighted points to Zappyhire
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight56% of the movement so far
HireQuotient35Zappyhire301.0 weighted points to HireQuotient
- 3
Human Oversight Design
12% weight72% of the movement so far
HireQuotient57Zappyhire500.8 weighted points to HireQuotient
- 4
FRIA Support
15% weight81% of the movement so far
HireQuotient22Zappyhire250.4 weighted points to Zappyhire
- 5
Customer Documentation
8% weight89% of the movement so far
HireQuotient50Zappyhire450.4 weighted points to HireQuotient
- 6
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight95% of the movement so far
HireQuotient40Zappyhire420.3 weighted points to Zappyhire
- 7
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight100% of the movement so far
HireQuotient30Zappyhire280.2 weighted points to HireQuotient
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -0.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that -0.1.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HireQuotient minus Zappyhire, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | HireQuotient | Zappyhire | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 30 | +5 | +1.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 18 | 28 | -10 | -1.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 25 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 40 | 42 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 57 | 50 | +7 | +0.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 28 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 50 | 45 | +5 | +0.4 |
| Total | 100% | 34F | 34F | - | -0.1 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HireQuotient | Zappyhire | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 24 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 12 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
HireQuotient has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Zappyhire has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Zappyhire sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 47 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for HireQuotient, across 1 distinct source domain, and 18 for Zappyhire, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HireQuotient last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Zappyhire last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.