§ The result
HireVue leads JobDiva on all 7 criteria.
Rubric v1.0 puts 29 points between HireVue (Video interview) and JobDiva (ATS-integrated): 58 for HireVue, 29 for JobDiva. HireVue leads every one of the 7 criteria and 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; JobDiva leads none. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (HireVue 80, JobDiva 15) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 41% of the weighted advantage HireVue holds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
HireVue
Asynchronous video interviewing platform with optional AI-driven assessment scoring of candidate responses.
Vendor profile
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
§ The record
HireVue is filed under Video interview AI, JobDiva under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only HireVue is in scope of Mobley v. Workday and Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | HireVue | JobDiva |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2004 | 2003 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 41% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HireVue 80 · JobDiva 15
11.7 weighted points to HireVue
20% weight · 66% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HireVue 65 · JobDiva 28
7.4 weighted points to HireVue
15% weight · 75% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HireVue 55 · JobDiva 38
2.5 weighted points to HireVue
12% weight · 83% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HireVue 60 · JobDiva 40
2.4 weighted points to HireVue
15% weight · 90% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HireVue 35 · JobDiva 22
1.9 weighted points to HireVue
12% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HireVue 45 · JobDiva 30
1.8 weighted points to HireVue
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HireVue 55 · JobDiva 42
1.0 weighted points to HireVue
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +28.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 28.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +29 beside that +28.8.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HireVue minus JobDiva.
| Category | Weight | HireVue | JobDiva | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 65 | 28 | +37 | +7.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 80 | 15 | +65 | +11.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 22 | +13 | +1.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 38 | +17 | +2.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 40 | +20 | +2.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 45 | 30 | +15 | +1.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 55 | 42 | +13 | +1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 58 (F) | 29 (F) | +29 | +28.8 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HireVue | JobDiva | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 2 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 13 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HireVue has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HireVue sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 43 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 15 for HireVue, across 4 distinct source domains, and 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HireVue last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next